17/05/2023
๐ฅ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐น๐๐ฏ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ช๐ฒ๐น๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น'๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ป๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐๐๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
In yet another victory for the River Club development in Observatory, Cape Town, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) handed down an order (attached) dismissing the Observatory Civic Associationโs (OCA) attempt to appeal the decision of the full bench of the Western Cape High Courtโs dismissal of the first instance judgment, in which the high court judges found the initial interdict order was granted as a result of incorrect and misleading submissions at the behest of OCA, namely, that there was exclusion or otherwise inadequate consultation by the developers, which was found patently false by the full bench.
The full bench of the High Court reversed the decision of the first instance court to grant an interdict and the three judges unanimously found that the OCAโs case had entirely failed to meet the requirements for an interdict against construction of the River Club development. The full bench had further found that there was no risk of harm at all to the heritage of the area and, in fact, the development might enhance the resource.
The OCA did not try and challenge the substance of the full bench courtโs decision but had attempted to challenge (on a contrived basis) the costs order that was granted against them, including the costs of two counsel of the developer, City of Cape Town, Western Cape Government and the Western Cape First Nation Collective .
The proceedings pursued by the OCA and its associates against the development have been vexatious and the high court appropriately granted a cost order against the OCA.
Notably, the SCA has dismissed the OCAโs leave to appeal application again with a costs order awarded against them on the grounds that the requirements for special leave to appeal were not satisfied, most importantly, OCA had no reasonable prospect or realistic chance of success on appeal.
Liesbeek Leisure Properties Trust (LLPT) feels vindicated by the SCA order, as over a period of more than four years it conducted an all-encompassing and exhaustive environmental, heritage and planning application process in full compliance with all applicable statutory requirements. Yet, was dragged to court by the OCA and its associates in a manifestly inappropriate strategy to try and stop the development at all costs. The appeal judgment of the high court makes it plain that the OCA failed to establish even a prima facie case as it found that the OCA โfailed the first hurdleโ
This latest judgment by the SCA is another win for the residents of Cape Town who stand to benefit from the numerous benefits the development will deliver and is in the process of implementing, including 6000 direct and 19 000 indirect jobs and the Cape Peninsula Khoi memorialising their cultural heritage associated with the area, including the establishment of a Heritage, Cultural and Media Centre. The project will also deliver developer subsidised affordable housing, safe and accessible green parks and gardens, significant road and other infrastructure upgrades in the area and the major rehabilitation of the polluted and degraded waterways adjacent to the property.