Matthew Rhodes Guns

Matthew Rhodes Guns Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Matthew Rhodes Guns, Outdoor & Sporting Goods Company, Underwood, IA.

04/18/2017

Off The Wall

Donna Johnson writes...

“I assume you’ve seen the United video. Were you as disturbed as I was? How can a company treat their customers like that and remain in business? I know you fly all the time – what would do if you were the CEO?”

Hi Donna

Like most people, I don’t enjoy seeing passengers dragged down the aisle of a commercial airplane, limp and lifeless. Nor do I enjoy seeing them hogtied at 37,000 feet, (which I’ve also had the occasion to witness – in person – and more than once.)

These kinds of episodes are always disturbing, but what bothered me initially about this video was not just the violence, it was the obvious ease with which it could have been avoided. A little common-sense and the freedom to apply it could have resolved this situation in a dozen different ways. Last night however, I watched a tape of United’s CEO, Oscar Munoz, as he attempted to walk back some earlier comments. He told ABC news that the passenger in question – David Dao - “did nothing wrong.”

Now, I’m no longer disturbed, Donna. I’m merely terrified.

Is Oscar serious? God, I hope not. I hope he’s just doing the typical “over-apology” thing CEO’s do when their “crisis experts” tell them they’ve got to say whatever it takes to win back the public trust. I hope he’s just reacting to some lawyer who told him before the interview, “for the love of God, Oscar, don’t blame the victim!” Well, Oscar certainly didn’t blame the victim. But in the process of finding him blameless, he suggested that millions of passengers are under no obligation to follow a direct command from United employees. And that’s a hell of a lot more disturbing than a beat-down in the main cabin.

Here’s the thing. It’s easy to forget that we have no right to fly. Buying a ticket doesn’t change that. So, when we board the plane, we have no right to remain there. We can be legally removed if we’re too drunk, too loud, too creepy, too suspicious, or too big for the seat. We can be removed if we stink. We can be removed if we’re insubordinate. We can be removed for whatever reason the airline deems necessary.

Obviously, airlines don’t like to remind us of such things, because it makes them sound mean. So they bury the truth in the fine print of a 37,000-word contract, and tell us how much they love us in sappy commercials and mandatory safety briefings that try oh-so-hard to make us smile. But the facts are clear: if you want to travel by air, you must agree to do what you’re told. If you don’t, you subject yourself to fine, arrest, constraint, forcible removal, and/or a permanent ban from the friendly skies. It’s all there in the fine print.

Personally, I support this policy. I support it because I don’t want to fly across the country in a steel tube filled with people who get to decide which rules they will follow and which they will ignore. I’ve been on too many flights with too many angry people to worry about the specific circumstances of their outrage, or the details of why they took it upon themselves to ignore a direct command. A plane is not a democracy, and the main cabin is no place to organize a sit-in. The main cabin is a place to follow orders.

Moving forward, what matters most to me is a heightened respect for the rules, and a heightened respect for the people who enforce them. Obviously, the policies that led to this particular fiasco need to change. But the greatest enemy we face in the friendly skies is not bad service – it’s anarchy. And I have no interest in flying with anyone who doesn’t follow orders. Do you? Does anyone?

Let me say it again. United made a business decision that was unbelievably, incomprehensibly stupid, and now they’re paying for it. (Seriously guys – what did you think was going to happen with two hundred citizen-reporters armed with cameras?) Point is, this is how the market is supposed to work. Their stock is down hundreds of millions of dollars, their customers are flying on other carriers, and according to CNN, they just might be the most hated company in the world today. But that doesn’t mean Dr. Dao “did nothing wrong.” He did. He ignored a direct order from a United representative while sitting on a United plane. He was told to leave and he refused to do so – multiple times by multiple people – all with the proper authority.

Does that mean he deserved a beating? Of course not. But it doesn’t mean he's innocent. Like the airline, Dr. Dao had options. He had recourse. He could have deplaned and pled his case to the gate agent. But he didn’t. He chose resistance. That was dumb. United chose confrontation. That was dumber. Now, here we are. Dumb and Dumber.

As for your question, Donna – if I were Oscar Munoz, I’d take a page from Charlotte McCourt, the 11-year old Girl Scout who became famous on this page for telling the truth about how Girl Scout cookies actually tasted, and then, wound up selling more Girl Scout cookies than anyone else in the world. First, I’d stop apologizing for the way in which that passenger was removed, and start apologizing for being cheap and short-sighted. Then, I’d apologize for valuing rules more than common sense. Then, if United still insists on overbooking future flights, I’d publicly empower my employees to offer any amount of money to entice people off of an over-sold plane. Whatever it takes – no cap, no limit.

But through it all, I’d make damn sure the world understood that passengers on my airline still need to follow the orders given by my people - even if they think those orders are stupid or unfair. And for that, I would make no apology whatsoever.

Finally, let me say to my many friends on the front line of the airline industry – flight attendants, pilots, gate agents, and those of you behind the counter - I appreciate what you do, sincerely, and I understand how difficult things are right now. Your jobs have become increasingly thankless over the years, even as they have become more critical. Thanks for your hard work.

Mike

PS. Oscar – I’ve prepared a new greeting for your pilots to read prior to take-off. I think it captures the kind of transparency many of your customers currently crave. Maybe one day, as I pull my seatbelt low and tight across my hips, I’ll get to hear it…

“Morning folks, and welcome aboard. This is your Captain speaking. I realize you paid a lot of money to rent the seat you’re currently occupying, but let’s be clear right from the get go – you have no right to be here. We’re glad that you are, but I don’t care how much you paid to fly with us today, or what you think you might be entitled to as a result. I’m in charge of this plane, and everyone on it. That includes you. So - if a flight attendant asks you to do something, don’t argue – just do it. We’ll try to make your flight as comfortable as possible, but make no mistake – your comfort is not our priority, and neither is your opinion about the decisions we make during the journey. As for safety, you’ll be pleased to know I have much to live for, and so does my co-pilot. So rest assured – we’ll be doing all we can up here to get ourselves back on the ground in one piece. That’s good news for the rest of you, assuming we can keep the main cabin attached to the cockpit. Finally, we value your business here at United, sincerely. And we appreciate the trust you’ve placed in us. But let’s not gild the lily. For the next few hours, we’re all in this together, so keep your hands to yourself, don’t get drunk, and listen to the flight attendants. In other words, try not to be an as***le. I’ll see you on the ground...”

Now that’s an airline I could get behind! Who’s with me?

Mike

Repostbut awesome!
02/02/2015

Repostbut awesome!

05/04/2014

1 pound target versus 130 grain .270 wi******er.

08/30/2012

Now carrying CMMG AR-15s, parts and accessories. Grab one today!

08/26/2012

Now accepting all major credit cards. Place your order today!!!

08/07/2012

Si Vas Pacem Parabellum

07/24/2012

I don’t normally get on a soap box, but the grumblings of gun control are starting to rumble again….

The Aurora, Colorado shooting was a horrific event. I can’t even imagine the pain and grief the friends and families of the victims are going through right now, I would never wish that upon anyone. However, blaming the weapons for the shooting, or blaming a lack of gun control laws for the shooting is like blaming the rock that the neighbor kid threw for breaking your window. The rock didn’t move itself, another human threw it and the guns didn’t purchase themselves, load themselves, and fire themselves, it took a human to make that all happen.

The guns that were used were reportedly all properly purchased and transferred in accordance with state and federal regulations. If this is the case, then anyone could have done this. Neither the guns, nor a lack of gun laws were the cause of this horrible event. Rather the cause was a human failure, a mental failure if you will. We cannot effectively predict who will have a psychotic event and go on a shooting rampage and who will not. If we were to try to do this, then we would be subject to arbitrary laws and regulations that unfairly characterized those who may be different from the society’s perceived norm. Who among the “free” world would like that?

The paperwork that a prospective fi****ms purchaser must complete requires the purchaser to answer questions concerning mental health, criminal history, etc. In addition to this, there is typically some sort of background check required as a part of this process as well. In addition, as a final check, one can reserve the right to refuse to sell a weapon to anyone they are not comfortable selling one to (provided they have any moral fortitude at all). Clearly, when these guns were purchased, either the individual lied, or was seeming mentally fit and not enduring a psychotic episode at that time, and lastly didn’t strike the fi****ms dealer as a customer they didn’t want to sell a weapon to.

These were not military grade weapons, they were an AR-15 (military version is an M4 or fully automatic), a shotgun, and a 40 caliber pistol. The average gun owner likely has at least one if not more of these in their home right now! So, the sales of military grade weapons was not the issue in this case either.

Perhaps a better way of preventing this from occurring again is to encourage more private citizens to obtain their concealed carry permit and encourage the active use of these permits. I’m pretty confident that had there been someone present that had a weapon on their person at the time of the shooting; there would have likely been less bloodshed and a lot less talk about gun control laws. Maybe the next guy who wants to go on a shooting spree will think again when they consider that there may be someone who will shoot back at them when they pull their weapon on innocent people.

06/04/2012

Thanks to Brandon Reuter. I hope you love the new AR-15!!

05/30/2012

Now proudly carrying LAR Grizzly weapons and accessories....order your's today!

05/26/2012

Thanks to Jeremy Stuhr for your purchase. I hope you find the .308 to fun to shoot and dead on accurate!

05/17/2012

Lead will be the currency of the next millenium...With lead you can get anything you want!

04/28/2012

Deal of the week: Savage Stevens Model 350 Field. 12 Gauge, 28 inch barrel, pump shotgun. Matte black synthetic "soft touch" stock and finish. Capacity 4+1, interchangeable choke tubes. This is a bottom ejection shotgun. MSRP is $294. Get yours today for only $221.00!

Address

Underwood, IA
51576

Opening Hours

Tuesday 5pm - 8pm
Saturday 8am - 10am
Sunday 8am - 10am

Telephone

+17125669008

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Matthew Rhodes Guns posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share