05/27/2026
I had two ACT students at the same time. Same tutor—me. Opposite outcomes.
Vikram came in at a 25. He was working with me 4-6 hours a week, putting in 15-20 total hours between sessions and homework. He'd been at it for nearly six months.
Final ACT score: 27.
Carter came in at a 23. He was doing about an hour a day—maybe 7 hours a week total. He took the test seven weeks in.
Final ACT score: 30.
Same tutor. Opposite outcomes.
For a while I thought something was off with Vikram. It wasn't. The variable wasn't him, and it wasn't me. It was the plan.
Carter's family came in with a forced deadline. Eight weeks, locked test date, every session pointed at that date. We knew on day one exactly what we'd attack and when.
Vikram's family wanted "intense" prep—no defined timeline, no locked test date, just keep working. So we did. He was scoring into the 30s on practice tests around week five.
Then his scores started moving in the wrong direction. Burnout was setting in, and because I was getting paid hourly, I didn't push back on the timeline.
When parents shop for ACT help, they almost always evaluate the tutor—credentials, reviews, the tutor's own ACT score.
That's the wrong question.
The right one is whether the tutor will hand you a full plan from day one—with a fixed test date and the highest-priority weaknesses tackled first.
A great tutor with no plan will lose to a mediocre tutor with a great plan every time.
If you want a guide for evaluating any ACT prep program before you pay, comment GUIDE and I'll send it your way.