09/20/2013
Does the TYPE of resistance used for hypertrophy matter?
I received an email from someone who has been working out with The Hook for years and wants to know if muscles are blind and will respond equally to any form of resistance, or whether or not the type of resistance used can effect muscle growth.
Well, it is my feeling that the type of resistance used does effect the amount of muscle growth. For example, we all know that isometrics can be effective in building strength, but doesn't do a lot in the hypertrophy arena. I believe that the best all-round routine would incorporate a number of protocols; weights, bodyweight, elastic bands, isos, yielding isos. The Hook is great for building muscle size, as the bands incorporate progressive resistance with each pull, much the same as Nautilus equipment, which produces a burn in your muscles not experienced with any other protocol. Weights provide a solid size-building foundation. They provide the means of performing compound exercises which will guarantee the ultimate in muscle growth, as opposed to isolation type exercises.
I like The Hook for it's muscle-burning, pumped-to-the-max results. I like lifting weights for their over-all strength and size building. For example, when you do curls with a barbell or dumbbells, you gotta reach down and lift the weight off the floor which brings into play the muscles of your back, legs, arms forearms - all those muscles needed to lift a heavy object off the floor. The combination of all of these muscles working together results in a compound exercise which will ensure that you are taking your muscle growth as far as it will go. I even combine bands with weights for the ultimate in muscle blasting. Weights also keep you honest. You can't delude yourself into believing that you are stronger than you actually are.
It is my opinion that The Hook is ideal for some exercises and that weights are best suited for other exercises. For example, I find The Hook best for triceps exercises; extensions, pushdowns, triceps curls. For me, dumbbells work best for presses and concentration curls. I do hammer curls with fat bars. I know that there are some people who swear by dead lifts. I prefer pushups to bench presses. Nothing can work the muscles of your back like chin-ups and pull-ups, bodyweight rows. As far as I'm concerned, pushup and chinups are the kings of upper body development, which can't be duplicated by weights or bands, unless you want to enhance the bodyweight exercises with either bands or weights.
To incorporate the benefits of isos into my workouts, I finish off each exercise with a good, solid, ten second iso. Isos build the fast-twitch fibers of your muscles. I recall once reading where, after a back workout, Arnold would grab hold of a pipe mounted vertically on a wall and pull on it, imagining himself to be Conan the Barbarian, ripping the pipe out of the wall.
For the ultimate in muscle growth, I incorporate all of the above into a supertsetting the supersets routine.
Finally, I believe that working out doesn't have to be, nor should it be, a case of one or the other. As soon as I hear someone saying that this protocol or that protocol is all you need, I think what a disservice they're doing to themselves. There's all kindsa stuff out there that can effectively contribute to muscle growth. Take advantage of all that you can.