09/03/2026
I’m Classical at heart.
But I absolutely believe there is a place for everything.
Teach contemporary Pilates. Make it athletic. Change the orientation. Add creativity if you choose to. Pilates doesn’t have to be frozen in time.
Personally, the longer I teach the Classical system, the less I feel the need to add to it.
The work is already there.
I was teaching Coordination yesterday and was reminded of exactly that. When you really teach the exercise — the control, precision, timing, opposition and intention — five beautifully executed repetitions are MORE than enough.
You don’t necessarily need another variation.
You don’t need another ten repetitions.
You can go deeper into the exercise instead of constantly adding more to it.
Joseph Pilates himself cautioned against exceeding the prescribed repetitions, writing that doing so creates muscular fatigue and that “there is really no need for tired muscles.”
And maybe that’s part of what we sometimes lose when Pilates becomes about constantly creating the next new thing.
But this brings me back to my original point.
If you WANT to change the work, change it.
If you want to teach contemporary Pilates, teach contemporary Pilates.
But shouldn’t we first understand what we’re changing?
Know the original exercise. Know its intention. Know where it sits within the system. Know WHY you are changing it and what that change is intended to achieve.
Because once you know the original work, you start seeing its DNA everywhere.
You recognize Up Stretch in something that doesn’t look exactly like Up Stretch. You feel Rowing in a completely different orientation. You recognize the intention even when the choreography changes.
That’s why I believe every Pilates teacher would benefit from knowing the Classical work — even if they never intend to teach Classical Pilates.
You don’t have to stay at the roots.
But I think you should know where they are before you start growing the branches.