11/23/2023
There have been a lot of questions going around about the Field Turf Project. We have asked a lot of questions on the safety / durabilty of the surface. We will post information that we have gotten regarding the safety issues.
Incidence, Causes, and Severity
of High School Football Injuries on
FieldTurf Versus Natural Grass
A 5-Year Prospective Study
Michael C. Meyers,*† PhD, FACSM, and Bill S. Barnhill,‡ MD
From the †Human Performance Research Center, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, Texas, and ‡Panhandle Sports Medicine Associates, Amarillo, Texas
Results: Findings per 10 team games indicated total injury incidence rates of 15.2 (95% confidence interval, 13.7-16.4) versus 13.9 (95% confidence interval, 11.9-15.6). Minor injury incidence rates of 12.1 (95% confidence interval, 10.5-13.6) versus 10.7(95% confidence interval, 8.7-12.7), substantial injury incidence rates of 1.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.6) versus 1.3 (95%confidence interval, 0.8-2.1), and severe injury incidence rates of 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.7) versus 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.8 ) were documented on FieldTurf versus natural grass, respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated significant playing surface effects by injury time loss, injury mechanism, anatomical location of injury, and type of tissue injured. Higher incidences of 0-day time loss injuries, noncontact injuries, surface/epidermal injuries, muscle-related trauma, and injuries during higher temperatures were reported on FieldTurf. Higher incidences of 1- to 2-day time loss injuries, 22+ days time loss injuries, head and neural trauma, and ligament injuries were reported on natural grass.