07/29/2026
When people watch elite players, they often describe what they see.
“He’s just faster.”
“She has better technique.”
“It’s just instinct.”
None of those explanations are necessarily wrong. They describe elite performance. But they don’t explain how another player closes the gap.
If Mbappé sprints past a defender, saying he’s faster describes the outcome. It doesn’t explain how another player becomes faster. To coach it, we break sprinting down into mechanics, force application, strength, power, and speed.
Decision-making is no different. Saying, “It’s just instinct,” may describe what elite performance looks like, but it doesn’t explain how that performance is produced or help another player improve.
That’s why I break performance down.
Not because I expect players to consciously think through every decision forever. I don’t.
I break it down because players can’t improve what they don’t understand.
The RC Methodology exists to identify the gap between your current performance and the defined standard. Once that gap is clear, development becomes intentional instead of guesswork. We don’t just analyze how players move or execute technically. We also analyze how they solve problems. What information did they recognize? Why did they choose that solution? Why was that solution more effective?
What looks instinctive at the highest level is often the product of years of experience. Through repeated exposure to similar situations, players recognize patterns, refine effective solutions, and those responses become increasingly automatic.
That’s the goal.
Not to consciously analyze every decision during the game.
To understand performance so well through practice and experience that effective decisions become your natural response.
When LT says, “See ball, go get ball,” he’s describing what elite performance can look like. Reaching that point takes years of learning, practice, and experience.
NFL