11/11/2021
So this High School XC runner in the final race of his senior year season has a breakthrough performance and in a moment of excitement shouts out profanity. The runner is DQed per NHSF rules.
https://www.pennlive.com/sports/2021/11/student-disqualified-from-cross-country-state-meet-for-swearing-at-the-finish-line.html?fbclid=IwAR1iTAue3Z2tRwIOqsdy1rFBZYMOYc-7rgi-4rehZLmrrgdlCseCvr8zvOI
To paraphrase Maya Angelou, people can forgive you for what say but never forget how you make them feel. This is bad PR for high school sports and HS XC specifically. You send the message that the rules are there to punish not regulate. How many people will react negatively once they read this story? You have to be some kind of heartless to not feel for this kid. Seasons of hard work and hard-fought fitness negated by an instance by a zero-tolerance policy.
Yes, we understand this is the rule but the feeling of injustice is strong and doesn't sit well here. What is the purpose of having this rule? What are we trying to teach here? Are we really trying to teach good sportsmanship or punish people for breaking social norms?
Rules that have nothing to do with performance but reflect the social norms of when they were instituted need to be reviewed on a regular basis. Also, these rules should allow discretion to take into account the situational context.
It seems draconian to DQ a kid for a brief emotional instance where a warning and a lecture (actually teaching) would serve the spirit of the rule better. A DQ would be warranted if the athlete continued with the profanity after being warned not for the first instance of it.
The Michigan high school runner set a personal best, but was disqualified for 'unacceptable conduct.'