Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group

Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group promotes resiliency to natural disasters in North Coast communities.

A member of California's Earthquake Country Alliance http://www.humboldt.edu/rctwg

Additional Preparedness Resources: https://linktr.ee/rctwg The Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group (RCTWG) is an organization of local, state and federal agencies, tribes, relief and service groups, land managers, and businesses from Del Norte, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties. The group was formed in July 1996 to defi

ne the needs of local jurisdictions to mitigate the North Coast earthquake and tsunami hazard and to promote a coordinated, consistent mitigation program for all coastal areas. It is a member of California's Earthquake Country Alliance.

06/11/2026

Come join us at the Redwood Acres Fair June 18th - 21st to experience the Cal OES ShakeTrailer and test your knowledge on earthquake and tsunami preparedness! The ShakeTrailer will be operating between 2 & 7 pm Thurs - Sat and between 1 & 6 pm on Sun. We'll see you there!

06/09/2026

Everyday is a great day to prepare for earthquakes and tsunamis! Join the Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group and California Governor's Office of Emergency Services at the Redwood Acres Fair June 18th - 21st. Come by to experience the ShakeTrailer, gather your tsunami maps, and test your knowledge!

Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group promotes resiliency to natural disasters in North Coast communities. A member of California's Earthquake Country Alliance http://www.humboldt.edu/rctwg

Additional Preparedness Resources: https://linktr.ee/rctwg

The tsunami threat has now been canceled by the PTWC for areas of the Philippines and Indonesia following today's M7.8 e...
06/08/2026

The tsunami threat has now been canceled by the PTWC for areas of the Philippines and Indonesia following today's M7.8 earthquake just off the south coast of the Philippine Island of Mindanao. A modest tsunami has been recorded at several tide gauges in the region - listed below. The earthquake caused damage to structures in the southern part of Mindanao - 3 deaths and several injuries have been reported, numbers that may go higher as search and rescue teams reach the hardest hit areas.

NO TSUNAMI THREAT to the US West Coast from today’s M7.8 in the Philippines.  Here’s the PTWC water height assessment
06/08/2026

NO TSUNAMI THREAT to the US West Coast from today’s M7.8 in the Philippines. Here’s the PTWC water height assessment

Here's the premilinary USGS location on today's earthquake in the Philippines - just off the south coast of Mindanao.  D...
06/08/2026

Here's the premilinary USGS location on today's earthquake in the Philippines - just off the south coast of Mindanao. Damage is expected in the populated areas of General Santos City.

An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 8.2 struck the Philippine Island region at 4:38 PM PDT near Mindanao.  The...
06/07/2026

An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 8.2 struck the Philippine Island region at 4:38 PM PDT near Mindanao. The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center has issued a tsunami threat message for the areas shown in purple below. The potential tsunami hazard for other areas is being assessed and we will update when more is known.

Not My Fault in today's Times-Standard (6/7/26) June earthquakes are a reminder that North Coast earthquakes come from d...
06/07/2026

Not My Fault in today's Times-Standard (6/7/26)
June earthquakes are a reminder that North Coast earthquakes come from different sources
Lori Dengler for the Times-Standard
Posted June 6, 2026
https://www.times-standard.com/2026/06/06/not-my-fault-june-a-reminder-that-north-coast-quakes-come-from-many-sources/

Image: June 3 earthquakes (orange circles) superimposed on a map of different sources of strong earthquakes in the North Coast region from a paper by Dengler, Carver, and McPherson published in 1992. The M5.7 earthquake was on a fault within the Gorda plate far offshore of Del Norte County. The M5.1 was on the Mendocino fault and likely an aftershock of a December 5, 2024, M7.0 quake. ....................................
Early Wednesday morning June 3, several earthquakes struck the North Coast region. I didn’t feel them, but others did. A M5.7 far struck far offshore of the CA – OR border a little before 4 AM and a M5.1 offshore of Cape Mendocino occurred a little under two hours later. The earthquakes were not large enough and too remote to cause any damage but are a reminder that we live in earthquake country and have numerous fault sources that can cause potentially damaging earthquakes.

The first earthquake occurred at 3:53 AM PDT and was centered 104 miles WNW of Crescent City. It was a shallow earthquake, less than 10 miles beneath the sea floor on a strike slip fault within the Gorda plate. The Gorda plate is the southernmost part of the Juan de Fuca plate system and the source of many of our strongly felt earthquakes. The slip on the fault was entirely horizontal and likely oriented in a NE – SW direction.

The USGS issued a ShakeAlert 29 seconds after the earthquake with an initial magnitude estimate of 5.2. ShakeAlert currently operates in the three West Coast states and is being expanded into Nevada. Utilizing a dense network of on shore seismic stations, it automatically locates, estimates magnitude, and forecasts likely shaking strength within seconds of the fault rupture initiation. The offshore location and moderate magnitude showed no coastal areas likely to feel moderate shaking, so the alert was not sent to cell phones through the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system.

Five minutes after the earthquake, the National Tsunami Warning Center (NTWC) in Palmer Alaska sent out a Tsunami Information Statement that the earthquake was too small to cause a noticeable tsunami. Their magnitude estimate was 5.7, identical to the final USGS magnitude that was confirmed a few minutes later. Information statements are the most common bulletins issued by NTWC, usually explaining that an earthquake has occurred, may have been felt, but was either too small or too deep to produce a noticeable tsunami.

The M5.7 was noticed by some people on the Northern California and Southern Oregon coast. Thirty-five people filed felt reports on the USGS “Did You Feel It?” web site, most between Crescent City and Reedsport. I’m suspicious of a few of them, it’s highly unlikely that it was felt by anyone in Fresno, and I think a few of the reports from the Humboldt County were likely confused with the second earthquake that occurred just under two hours later. No aftershocks have been recorded to date, although the USGS still estimates a one in five chance of an M3 event in the next week.

There is nothing unusual about the 5.7. Eight earthquakes in the magnitude 5 range have occurred in this part of the Gorda plate in the past five years and 35 since 1980, the largest a 7.0 in August 1991. Our largest North Coast quake of 2025 was a 5.7 50 miles NW of Wednesday’s tremor. Although not as common as earthquakes in the southern part of the Gorda plate, they are not infrequent, and we can expect them to continue in the future. Their remote offshore location makes them unlikely to be felt by many or cause damage, but a repeat of the 1991 M7.0, especially if nearer to the coast, could cause damage in Del Norte County and would likely trigger a tsunami warning for the region, even though the tsunami potential of strike-slip earthquakes is small.

Earthquakes in the Gorda plate are driven by regional tectonic stresses. To the north, the main part of the Juan de Fuca plate is slowly spreading out from the Juan de Fuca ridge and moving in in a southeast direction relative to the Pacific plate, exerting a very large force on the much smaller Gorda plate. The Gorda plate can’t move out of the way because it is constrained by the enormous buttress of the older, colder Pacific plate south of the Mendocino fault and the North American continent to the east. The only response is to “crack” under the pressure, resulting in the numerous faults and moderate to large earthquakes in the interior of the plate.

An hour and fifty-two minutes after the Gorda plate 5.7, an earthquake occurred on the Mendocino fault, 120 miles SSE of the earlier earthquake. ShakeAlert issued a message 14 seconds after the earthquake with an initial magnitude of 4.2, not large enough to trigger WEA alerts to cell phones. The NTWC issued a tsunami statement six minutes after the earthquake notifying us that a M4.9 had occurred, and no tsunami would be generated. A few minutes later, the USGS updated the magnitude to 5.1 with a location on the Mendocino fault, 39 miles west of Petrolia. Fault analysis shows purely E-W horizontal slip, consistent with the orientation of the Mendocino fault.

The 5.1 was felt more widely than the earlier M5.7. The USGS “Did You Feel It?” site includes 121 credible felt reports from Westport in northern Mendocino County to McKinleyville. No one reported any damage. Seven aftershocks have been recorded to date, including a 4.5 at 6:11 AM, a 4.0 at 8:51 AM and a 4.5 at 7:36 PM all on June 3 and reported felt lightly. The USGS gives a 28% likelihood of more aftershocks in the M3 range over the next week.

Earthquakes are common on the Mendocino fault, the transform plate boundary between the Gorda plate to the north and the Pacific plate to the south. It is one of the most active fault systems in the lower 48 states in terms of earthquake production. Wednesday’s 5.1 was centered almost on top of the epicenter of the December 5, 2024, M7.0 and is likely an aftershock of that event. Seismic activity in the aftershock zone had quieted over the past six months, but it’s not unusual for spurts of activity to occur years after earthquake of this size. The USGS aftershock forecast of the 2024 quake still gives a 14% likelihood of another M5 in the next year.

Two earthquakes less than two hours apart might make you think they are related, and they are, but only in the general way of responding to the regional tectonic stresses. The offshore Crescent City and the Cape Mendocino earthquakes have no direct relationship. They were in distinctly different tectonic environments, and it was only coincidence that they occurred so closely together in time.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen different source areas in our area set off quakes so close together. On August 16, 1991, a M6.1 earthquake occurred in the Gorda plate 24 miles SE of Wednesday’s 5.7. Twenty-one hours later, a M6.0 occurred in Honeydew 130 miles away. Three hours after the Honeydew earthquake, a M7 occurred near the location of the 6.1. No question that the 6.1 and 7.0 were related. They were centered only two miles apart and had the same type of fault orientation and slip. But Honeydew was a thrust earthquake in the triple junction area and likely related to the Cascadia subduction zone. It was pure coincidence that these two different areas had earthquakes at the same time.

I’ve been thinking about source areas of North Coast earthquakes for a long time. In 1992, along with co-authors Gary Carver and Bob McPherson, we summarized our thoughts on all of the different potential fault systems and tectonic regimes that could cause large earthquakes. We came up with five distinctly different regions: the Gorda plate and the Mendocino fault active this week, the San Andreas fault, shallow faults in the North American plate, and the Cascadia subduction zone.

Our 1992 paper still holds up pretty well, and those five regions are still our primary source candidates. But it’s time to update that paper with everything new we’ve learned in the 34 years since it was published. At the time, we thought the 1954 Fickle Hill earthquake might have been on a North American plate fault. A re-examination surprised us all by likely putting it on the subduction zone interface, so we still have no recent examples of an earthquake on any of our mapped surface faults. We will add a “downslab tension” region just inland of the coast on north-south oriented normal faults. Two moderately deep mid M5 earthquakes in the early 2000s range likely caused by stretching of the subducting slab. We knew about these earthquake before, but they had all been smaller. And we need to expand our Gorda plate seismicity zone all the way west to the Gorda ridge as the whole Gorda plate is capable of producing earthquakes.

My big project for the next year is to update the ’92 paper and call on better brains than mine to rethink how these regions are interconnected.

Note: Our 1992 Sources of North Coast Seismicity paper is athttps://kamome.humboldt.edu/sites/default/files/Sources%20of%20North%20Coast%20Seismicity.pdf
-----------------------
Lori Dengler is an emeritus professor of geology at Cal Poly Humboldt, and an expert in tsunami and earthquake hazards. The opinions expressed are hers and not the Times-­Standard’s. All Not My Fault columns are archived online at https://kamome.humboldt.edu/taxonomy/term/5 and may be reused for educational purposes. Leave a message at (707) 826-6019 or email [email protected] for questions and comments about this column or to request copies of the preparedness magazine “Living on Shaky Ground.”

How unusual were today's M5.7 and 5.1 earthquakes (in orange on the USGS epicenter map below.)  Not very.  The map shows...
06/03/2026

How unusual were today's M5.7 and 5.1 earthquakes (in orange on the USGS epicenter map below.) Not very. The map shows magnitude 5 and larger earthquakes since 1990, and includes 99 events, the largest two M7.2s. It is also not unusual to have several large events close together in time although not directly related. In a 24 hour period in August 1991, M6.0 and 7.0 earthquakes occurred in the same area as this morning's 5.7 and a 6.0 was in the triple junction area near Honeydew. Could they be foreshocks of something bigger? Not likely but on the North Coast there is always a small but real chance of a major earthquake occurring on any of our regional fault systems.

Some of you may have gotten ShakeAlert messages early this morning.  A few people on the Del Norte and Curry County coas...
06/03/2026

Some of you may have gotten ShakeAlert messages early this morning. A few people on the Del Norte and Curry County coast were notified of a M 5.7 offshore of the CA-OR border at 3:53 AM PDT centered 104 miles WNW of Crescent City. It was reported felt by a few from Scotia to Reedsport. ShakeAlerts were also issued after a M5.2 earthquake occurred on the Mendocino fault at 5:53 AM PDT 40 miles W of Petrolia. That earthquake was felt lightly from Westport to Brookings and was followed by a M4.5 26 minutes later that was also felt lightly by some in Humboldt County. These earthquakes were not directly related, the first was in the Gorda plate near an area where a number of earthquake in the M5 range have occurred in the past year and the second was on the Mendocino fault and arguably an aftershock of the December 5, 2024 M7.

Not My Fault in today's Times-Standard (5/31/26) August Landslide Tsunami in Alaska ranks as the second highest of all t...
05/31/2026

Not My Fault in today's Times-Standard (5/31/26)
August Landslide Tsunami in Alaska ranks as the second highest of all time
Lori Dengler for the Times-Standard
Posted May 30, 2026
https://www.times-standard.com/2026/05/30/lori-dengler-august-landslide-sunami-in-alaska-ranks-as-the-second-highest-of-all-time/
Image: Air photo of Tracy Arm, a glacial fjord in Southeastern Alaska, showing the exposed scarp of the August 10, 2025, landslide and the barren hillside on the opposite side of the valley where the tsunami surge removed trees and other vegetation (USGS).........................
Last summer, a massive landslide slid into a fjord south of Juneau Alaska, producing an enormous surge of water that ran up the opposite hillside and sped down the channel, scraping off trees and soil and disturbing kayakers camped nearby. In the nearly ten months since the slide, geologists, seismologists, and tsunami scientists have been studying all aspects of the event. On May 6, a 19-member team led by Dan Shugar of the University of Calgary published the first comprehensive analysis of the landslide and ensuing tsunami in the journal Science.

The study examined the setting, seismic recordings of the landslide, remote imagery, post event field reconnaissance, modeled the slide and tsunami, and reveals a much larger event than was first estimated (see Not My Fault 8/16/26). Landslide movement wasn’t instantaneous, telltale signs of the failure began days beforehand, and like the landslide tsunami generated in a Greenland fjord in 2023, the tsunami continued to oscillate within the fjord for days afterwards.

South Sawyer Glacier at the head of Tracy Arm is one of thousands of glaciers in the Juneau ice field, and one of the most accessible by cruise ships from Alaska’s capital. The fjord, named after Benjamin Tracy, a Civil War General who became Secretary of the Navy in the Harrison administration, is over 30 miles long, the upper fifth still covered in ice. The fjord was completely covered in ice as recently as the cold period known as the Little Ice Age, peaking in this area in the 1800s. Since then, rising temperatures have triggered thinning and retreat of all the glaciers in the region, changing both the hydrology and stability of valley walls.

Prior to the August landslide, concern over glacial-retreat-triggered slope destabilization had become an issue in much of Alaska, but Tracy Arm was not singled out as a region of particular concern. Several cruise ships would visit the area daily in the peak summer tourist months, and private or organized kayak tours also frequented the area. Visitors were well aware of the hazards of floating ice and glacial calving and were alerted to stay well away from the glacial front, but there was no alerting system or landslide/tsunami protocols in place at the time of last summer’s slide.

The landslide occurred at 5:26 AM Alaska time seemingly without warning. There were no visible signs of the incipient failure, but a careful analysis of seismic data in the days preceding the failure showed all was not quiet. Jackie Caplan-Auerbach, a seismologist at Western Washington University and one of the co-authors of the Science study, is friends with a couple who were anchored in Endicott Arm last August, the next fjord south of Tracy Arm. They contacted Jackie after experiencing unusual swells and surges on what should have been quiet waters. Jackie looked at the seismic records from the two nearby stations and saw not only a signal characteristic of a landslide, but precursory noise as well.

Earthquakes are easy to recognize on a seismogram with the sharp onsets of P and S-waves followed by the longer period surface waves. Landslides look different, often longer duration and spindle shaped as the slide builds up speeds and then slows down. Landslides are sometimes preceded by precursors, a sort of stutter as the mass begins to creak. Jackie noticed a strong precursory signal in the hours before the final failure and over the next months, she and colleagues would pour over the records, filtering and processing for finer detail. Unfortunately, the seismometers were over 60 miles from the landslide source, and the vibrations were faint but still enough to tell an interesting story. In the 36 hours prior to the slide, the precursory signal steadily builds, becoming almost a continuous tremor in the hour before failure. Ongoing examination suggests the precursors began as much as a week beforehand.

The slide itself was enormous. A volume of 64 million cubic meters of material, equivalent to 25 great Giza pyramids, took less than two minutes to collapse into the fjord below. Seismic stations more than 600 miles away recorded the vibrations generated by the landslide. It was also detected on an array of infrasound detectors, some over 200 miles distant. The response of the displaced water was quick, accelerating up onto the opposite side and removing soil and vegetation to a height of 1,578 feet above the water level. This tsunami now ranks as the second highest credible tsunami ever recorded, surpassed only by the 1958 Lituya Bay tsunami at 1,721 feet.

Four groups of people camped near Tracy Arm witnessed the tsunami. Closest were a group of kayakers who awoke to water carrying away a boat and much of their gear, although as a precaution they had stored it well above the water level. Pat Lynett at USC, another member of the Science publication team, used their accounts, water level recordings, and remote sensing data to model the Tracy Arm tsunami. The area near the source would have been dominated by “a cross-channel-directed, intensely turbulent, white-water surge” moving at speeds of 150 mph. It took only minutes for the surge to reach several common Tracy Arm cruise viewing locations, which were fortunately unoccupied due to the early morning hour. Farther down the fjord, channel geometry produced localized amplification as water accelerated around curves and embankments.

Once exiting Tracy Arm, the tsunami wave energy quickly dissipated as the water spread into the larger Endicott Arm and Stephens Passage, but the complex channel shape produced significant irregularity in the water heights with some areas experiencing only a few feet of flooding and other exceeding 20 feet. All tsunamis exhibit some variation in height due to coastal shape, but fjords exacerbate the differences.

This transition from the deep narrow channel of Tracy Arm to the wider channels of Endicott Arm also affected the period of the tsunami. We usually talk about the very long periods of tsunamis compared to normal ocean waves. Earthquake-triggered tsunamis typically have periods of many minutes to over an hour. In the confines of Tracy Arm, modeling shows tsunami periods were only about a minute, but once reaching the wider channels, were about 20 minutes.

A noticeable feature of the Tracy Arm tsunami was its duration. We call the long duration sloshing in a confined channel a seiche and because of the relatively low friction on the channel walls, seiches in fjords can last a long time. The 2023 landslide-triggered tsunami seiche in Greenland lasted 9 days with amplitudes of 20 to 30 feet. The Tracy Arm seiche was not as large, with a dominant period of just over an hour that lasted a day and a half.

The Tracy Arm landslide and tsunami caused no significant damage or injuries to people or property. The gear lost by the kayak group was the only cost. It was fortuitous timing that minimized the loss. Had it occurred later in the day when several cruise ships were in the fjord within a few miles of the landslide source, the outcome would have been different. The question arises, is there any way to warn or reduce the hazard to tourists in the future?

With thousands of glaciers retreating in Alaska, it is not possible to instrumentally monitor all of them to identify potential precursors to major slides. The State of Alaska has a landslide monitoring group, and the August event has increased interest in assessing hazards and identifying those of most concern to human activity. Barry Arm in the Prince William Sound area has been the subject of much concern for over a decade and a warning system with State and the National Tsunami Warning Center has been developed for that specific area. But elsewhere, landslides are not part of tsunami warning protocol.

Our tsunami warning system is focused on earthquake-triggered tsunamis. They are the most common and have the greatest potential to impact people. We have a good understanding of the relationship between earthquakes and tsunamis and can analyze the earthquake signal to project the tsunami threat in a timely manner. Landslides are far trickier, and although the Tracy Arm study showed precursors, they aren’t easily adaptable for warnings or applicable elsewhere.

In the near term, the approach has been to limit exposure in Tracy Arm. Most cruise operators have cancelled Tracy Arm from their 2026 itineraries, choosing to focus on nearby Endicott Arm instead. There is no way to prohibit private groups from visiting the area, but it is being strongly discouraged. But Tracy Arm is not the only place in Southeastern Alaska where landslides in fjords are a threat. The Dawes glacier at the head of Endicott Arm is also retreating and the same factors that triggered the Tracy Arm slide are present there as well.

What is the relevance of the Tracy Arm tsunami to the North Coast? The extraordinary water heights seen in Tracy Arm and Lituya Bay are not possible here. But landslides falling into water bodies are something to be aware of. Whether a slide into a river, or along the coast, it’s always a good precaution to move away from the water’s edge when you feel an earthquake.

Note: The full Science article is at https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aec3187, including an animation of tsunami.
-----------------------
Lori Dengler is an emeritus professor of geology at Cal Poly Humboldt, and an expert in tsunami and earthquake hazards. The opinions expressed are hers and not the Times-­Standard’s. All Not My Fault columns are archived online at https://kamome.humboldt.edu/taxonomy/term/5 and may be reused for educational purposes. Leave a message at (707) 826-6019 or email [email protected] for questions and comments about this column or to request copies of the preparedness magazine “Living on Shaky Ground.”

Address

Arcata, CA
95521

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Redwood Coast Tsunami Work Group posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share