Studio de' physique

04/12/2018

Despite the continuing concern regarding fructose’s unique metabolic effects, which stems from low-quality ecological studies, animal models and select human studies, the highest level of evidence from systematic review and metaanalysis does not support a direct causal relationship with cardiometabolic disease. Using the totality of the highest quality evidence from controlled feeding trials, we demonstrate that fructose-containing sugars can lead to weight gain, increase in cardiometabolic risk factors and disease only if it provides the excess calories. When the calories are matched, fructose-containing sugars do not appear to cause weight gain compared to other forms of macronutrients including complex carbohydrates, fats and protein, and in low doses fructose might even show benefit. Prospective cohort studies, which provide the strongest observational evidence, have shown an association between fructose-containing sugars and cardiometabolic risk including weight gain, cardiovascular disease outcomes and diabetes only when restricted to SSBs and not for sugars from other sources. In fact, the harmful effect of SSBs is likely driven by a collinearity with an unhealthy lifestyle as SSB drinkers consume more calories, exercise less, smoke more and have a poor dietary pattern.

In summary, there is nothing unique about the sugar, fructose. It is harmful when in excess but potentially beneficial when taken in small amounts—providing evidence that it is the excess energy that is causing harm and not some unique metabolic effect. Still, the potential for overconsumption of sugars in form of sugary foods and drinks is substantial, and targeting added sugars as a source of excess calories appears to be a prudent strategy. However, sugar content should not be seen as the sole determinant of a healthy diet. There are many other factors in the diet—some providing excess calories while others provide beneficial nutrients. We should consider the whole diet for health benefits compared to just focusing on one nutrient. In this regard, improvements in dietary patterns appear to have the greatest influence on weight gain and cardiometabolic risk and represent the best opportunity for successful intervention.

30/11/2018

Stunning performers @ recently held Adani half marathon from Studio de' physique Strength & Conditioning class.

being our one of the most consistent members since 8 year convinced his runners friends to join our Strength & Conditioning coaching. In India Strength & Conditioning for sports performance is either Badly neglected or Poorly executed from coaches. By just mimicking exercise movements of celebs on Instagram won't yield any results. Programming is the key!

They all joined in April 2018 and in just 7 month their timings improved by 12 to 15 minutes. All runners participated in 36 to 50 year age group.
Best part is; They all are so sincere and consistence with their running practice and strength & conditioning.

Phenomenal performance came from Desai Baldev bhai; at age of 48, he finished 5th clocking 1:41:26 for 21km. His previous best before joining our S&C was 1:56:14. Timings improved by 15min.
Pathik Patel finished 12th clocking 1:47:31.




Baldev Desai:. 1:56:14. 1:41:26
Pathik Patel:. 2:02:02. 1:47:31
: 2:08:24. 1:56:24
:. 2:17:38. 2:05:42

On behalf of all members of Studio de' physique, we heartily Congratulate them for their phenomenal performance !!

20/11/2018

Twenty studies including 37 134 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with omnivores, vegetarians and vegans had lower BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine and vegans also had higher fracture rates.

The findings of this study suggest that both vegetarian and vegan diets are associated with lower BMD compared with omnivorous diets and that vegans have a higher fracture risk than omnivores. The effect of vegan diets on BMD is more pronounced than the effect of vegetarian diets. Both vegetarian and vegan diets should be appropriately planned to avoid dietary deficiencies associated with bone health.

AbstractContext. The numbers of vegans and vegetarians have increased in the last decades. However, the impact of these diets on bone health is still under deb

15/11/2018

Nope,
I often see dogmatic statement posted by Indian coaches/Nutritionists, I've to rewind my learning 4-5 year back.

Now see the graph: 70% of Dieticians and 55% Personal Trainers believe that FAT is excreted as Energy or Heat. This's the level of their Education/Knowledge. Even Doctors are not behind; 65%.

84% of fat we lose through Carbon dioxide exhalation where our lungs being primary excretory organ for fat loss. A tiny amount of 16% fat excreted in sweat, urine, f***s, tears, and other bodily fluids.

02/07/2018

We don't do cool-downs at Studio de' physique since 2011. Cool-down is most over hyped strategies. if there're benefits, they're minor. And there's always a time related cost involved.
Gyms, personal trainers who make you do cool-down, are stealing your precious workout time and make you feel having a longer workout by adding unproductive cool-down. I would rather add a couple of exercises or a couple of sets to increase workout volume.

-By Kulin.

It is widely believed that an active cool-down is more effective for promoting post-exercise recovery than a passive cool-down involving no activity. However, research on this topic has never been...

14/06/2018

Medical myths.
Sometimes even doctors are duped!

Mixed Messages Medical myths BMJ 2007; 335 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39420.420370.25 (Published 20 December 2007) Cite this as: BMJ 2007;335:1288 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Rachel C Vreeman, fellow in children’s health services research1, Aaron E Carroll, assistan...

19/05/2018

Learn Unarmed Combat with Donald Melville Sir.
Regular classes starting from 2nd June,2018 Saturday.

☎️ +919725339946 for booking and further inquiries.

🔴WHAT IS Chi-Sao Training

Through the systematic reflex and feeling training Chi-Sao ("sticking hands") automatic responses to touch stimuli are trained. The benefits of this tactile, reflexive action are the enormous speed, reliability and low age-related decline. In an attack, the forces acting on the arms or legs cause immediate counter-techniques that use the power of the opponent.
Who trains Chi-Sao, has a great physical flexibility and can successfully defend against physically superior opponents.

17/05/2018

Nope, Electrolytes deficit or Dehydration are NOT the causes of MUSCLE CRAMPS (EAMC - Exercise-Associated Muscle Cramps)

CONCLUSIONS The development of EAMC is more common in the later stages of athletic events and is more prevalent among athletes who exercise at relatively vigorous intensities. In addition, several large prospective cohort investigations have shown no association between hydration status, electrolyte concentrations, and EAMC. Based on these considerations, the altered neuromuscular control theory is the most cogent descriptive model that explains the origins of EAMC. Although the available evidence supports a neuromuscular foundation that stems from fatigue, further research is needed to elucidate the specific risk factors that contribute to neuromuscular fatigue and underlie EAMC. Owing to the limited understanding of fatigability and the involved mechanisms, the most effective prevention methods are unknown. Strong evidence indicates that stretching is the most effective method for treating acute muscle cramps.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27159592

15/05/2018

🔴 UNARMED COMBAT. Extremely useful for ladies in real-life scenarios. Learn from the best in India; Donald Melville Sir.

Donald Sir's Unarmed combat system is a combination of various styles of martials arts including - WING TSUN SYSTEM & ESCRIMA ( Escrima is a Filipino martial art fought with a 2 feet bamboo stick). This art is heavily adopted and acclaimed by various elite forces of the world including; FBI, many SWAT teams of the USA, German police, GSG-9 and SEK forces (Anti-terrorist units) in Germany.These techniques are taught to the above Special Forces BY the same coach from whom Donald sir has learnt: SIFU SALIH AVCI (Germany), SIFU LEUNG TING (Hong Kong).

Donald Sir has been teaching these techniques of Un-armed combat (UAC) since 28 years to Anti-terrorist squads, Special Operation Commando forces, NSG, CRPF, BSF, IPS officers @ National Police Academy, Hydrabad and various other special forces.

🔴To learn more on our Unarmed combat classes and get registered, FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW;

https://m.facebook.com/events/235699553844789

15/05/2018

Learn with Donald Sir.
Unarmed combat classes starting from 2nd June, 2018.
Presentation & Demo on 20 May, 2018 at Studio de' physique @ 11.00am.

For registeration follow the below link;

https://m.facebook.com/events/235699553844789

ESCRIMA: is a Filipino weapon combat in which both the defense against and the attack with different cut, stab and bladed weapons is practiced. Training is usually done with a stick about 2 feet long made of Bamboo. Escrima is based on principles. The trained techniques can therefore be transferred to various everyday objects, such as umbrellas, walking sticks, keys and handbags and are universally applicable. The defense against armed attackers gains in view of the unfortunately growing willingness of violent to use even knives or batons, increasingly important. Wing Tsun and Escrima complement each other perfectly; together they cover all areas of self-defense with and without weapons.

https://m.facebook.com/events/235699553844789

,

14/05/2018

IN DEFENCE OF SUGAR: A CRITIQUE OF DIET-CENTRISM.

CONCLUSION:
In this review, I presented evidence to challenge diet-centrism and demonstrate that diet-centric reductionism has led researchers, policy-makers, and the public seriously astray. The consumption of dietary sugars is entirely innocuous in healthy populations and essential for many highly-active individuals. Thus, the only reason sugar consumption now appears deleterious in industrialized nations is that PA levels and metabolic-flux are too low to support metabolic health. Until the pathologies of physical inactivity and high sedentary behaviors are corrected, our population’s metabolic health will continue to decline. As such, current dietcentric hyperbole surrounding sugar consumption impedes progress in medical science by diverting attention and research resources from the true causes of obesity and metabolic diseases: low levels of PA and reduced metabolic-flux.

ABSTRACT:

Sugars are foundational to biological life and played essential roles in human evolution and dietary patterns for most of recorded history. The simple sugar glucose is so central to human health that it is one of the World Health Organization's Essential Medicines. Given these facts, it defies both logic and a large body of scientific evidence to claim that sugars and other nutrients that played fundamental roles in the substantial improvements in life- and health-spans over the past century are now suddenly responsible for increments in the prevalence of obesity and chronic non-communicable diseases. Thus, the purpose of this review is to provide a rigorous, evidence-based challenge to 'diet-centrism' and the disease-mongering of dietary sugar. The term 'diet-centrism' describes the naïve tendency of both researchers and the public to attribute a wide-range of negative health outcomes exclusively to dietary factors while neglecting the essential and well-established role of individual differences in nutrient-metabolism. The explicit conflation of dietary intake with both nutritional status and health inherent in 'diet-centrism' contravenes the fact that the human body is a complex biologic system in which the effects of dietary factors are dependent on the current state of that system. Thus, macronutrients cannot have health or metabolic effects independent of the physiologic context of the consuming individual (e.g., physical activity level). Therefore, given the unscientific hyperbole surrounding dietary sugars, I take an adversarial position and present highly-replicated evidence from multiple domains to show that 'diet' is a necessary but trivial factor in metabolic health, and that anti-sugar rhetoric is simply diet-centric disease-mongering engendered by physiologic illiteracy. My position is that dietary sugars are not responsible for obesity or metabolic diseases and that the consumption of simple sugars and sugar-polymers (e.g., starches) up to 75% of total daily caloric intake is innocuous in healthy individuals

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29727610?dopt=Abstract