02/04/2026
Feedback in practice is something many golfers either overlook… or misunderstand.
I see golfers relying purely on feel.
I see others obsessing over video or technical positions.
Which is best?
Is there a “right” type of feedback?
Research in golf—and more broadly within the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning—gives us a clearer direction.
Augmented feedback (video, verbal cues, external information) is a key part of how we learn skills.
It helps guide attention, reinforce success, and accelerate improvement.
But here’s the interesting part:
In golf, no single form of feedback consistently outperforms another.
Verbal, visual, and other methods often produce similar results.
However… practice without feedback often leads to little or no improvement.
So the question isn’t which type is best—
it’s how you use it.
Golfers benefit from using clear, purposeful feedback that leads to adjustment, not just information.
✅ A good example:
Filming swings with a specific intention (not just recording for the sake of it)
Tracking ball flight and strike patterns
Using one simple cue or feel at a time
Making a change before the next shot
❌ A bad example:
Hitting balls with no awareness of outcome
Filming swings but never reviewing them
Using multiple swing thoughts at once
Repeating the same movement without any adjustment
More advanced players can take this further by:
Reducing constant feedback
Delaying evaluation until after a series of shots
Combining different feedback sources (ball flight + feel + occasional video)
‼️For me this highlights a simple truth:
Augmented feedback supports learning—but only when it leads to action.
Practice isn’t repetition. It’s response.‼️
Based on -
Barzyk, P., & Gruber, M. (2024). Motor learning in golf-a systematic review. Frontiers in sports and active living, 6, 1324615. https://lnkd.in/emiBb_xG
golfimprovement