26/10/2025
Nations represented in the top 100 men’s and women’s rankings 2025
I have written so much over the past few years about professional tennis and that the current “broken” system and the articles can be viewed in my website www.davemileytennis.com.
Dominic Thiem said recently that it cost 1 million dollars approximately to go from a ten year’s old junior player to reach the top 100 ATP rankings and start earning money. This money for his development came from a combination of his family, the Austrian Tennis Federation and sponsors and not from the ATP/WTA tours or the Grand Slams.
In the article….. “top international tennis…what’s in it for the tennis federations and the tennis farmers and factory workers” I explained that unlike sports like football, ice hockey, rugby, baseball etc. there is no system to reward or pay back the people or organizations that develops the players that later reach the top 100 ATP and WTA and participate in the financially successful top pro tour events. It seems to be becoming increasingly difficult for nations to get players into the top 100.
On the way to the ATP event in Almaty last week, my transport got stuck in traffic and I started to look at the current rankings and at the nations that are represented in the top 100 (see details in the photos attached). I think for the health of the sport, it’s important to have a lot of countries from the different regions of the world represented at the top of the pro game but what I found is that we risk soon having a sport where only a few nations will be able to develop players good enough to get there.
What I saw is the following:
There are 28 nations represented in the top 100 of the men’s ranking and 36 nations in the Women’s rankings. There are 43 nations represented in the combined men’s and women’s rankings but 17 of these only have one player. So just 26 nations have 2 or more players in the top 100 men and women’s rankings combined.
In the men’s top 100 rankings, 4 nations have 46 players (46%), 8 nations have 66 players (66%), 13 nations have 81 players (81%) and 17 nations have 89 players (89%).
In the women’s rankings, 3 nations have 35 players (35%), 7 nations have 51 players (51%), 13 nations have 69 players (69%) and 21 nations have 85 players (85%).
In the men’s rankings, the Grand Slam nations have 38 players and in the women’s rankings they have 29 players making a total of 67 players out of the combined men and women top 100 (33.5%). Their success is of course due to good work by those involved but is also partly due to the large budgets they have for player development, the access to coaching support on the lower levels of the competition pathway and wild cards for their players coming up which players from most other nations do not often have access to.
In the combined 200 players ranked, 98 players are from only 6 nations (49%) and 129 players are from 10 nations (64.5%).
Countries like Argentina in the men and Czech Republic in the women should be congratulated as they continue to develop players with less resources than the other top nations and this is due to certain unique factors which I will not get into here.
What I fear is that in the future, there will be progressively less nations represented among the top 100 men and women and this could have a very negative impact on the promotion of the sport globally and TV rights/sponsorship for the big tournaments that showcase the top players. Every player wherever they are from should feel that they have a chance to fulfil their dream to be a top players.
My suggestion has not changed since I ran for president of the ITF in 2019. There should be a system in place for the top pro events to give back to the game and to the development of the next generation of players. My suggestion continues to be that 10% of the Grand Slam Prizemoney (approximately 6 million each) and a percentage of prizemoney from the top ATP/WTA tour events should all go into a Development Fund. For ATP/WTA I suggest for 1000 level events- 5%, 500 level events-2.5% and 250 level events-1%. This 30 million + fund could be jointly administered and then be used to support player development in the ITF member nations especially the ones with no pro players in the top 100 rankings . This would give meaningful help to the federations with the development players and for the tournaments that bring them to the top level (Juniors, Futures, Challengers etc.).
Despite the fact that the top 100 men and women have cost over 200 million to produce and that the international tournament pathway costs the ITF Federations over 120 million annually to organize, the Tours contribute nothing back. The Grand Slams do give annually 3 million dollars to the Grand Slam Player Development Fund, and I commend them for this. But please keep in mind that this contribution of 3 million annually represents only 1.2% of the total combined 2025 Grand Slam Prizemoney. The amount they were contributing in 1990 to the fund was 2.2 million which was 7.3% of the 30 million combined prizemoney at that time. If the percentage link to prizemoney had been maintained, this amount being contributed by the Slams today would be close to 20 million dollars per year.
My prediction now is that if nothing is done to change the system, it is likely that in ten years time there will be only 10-15 nations that can produce players to the level of the top 100 ATP and WTA, and this will not be good for the sport of tennis or for the income generating potential of the top events.