01/03/2025
A recent randomized controlled trial (PMID: 39364857) looked at the impact of a 10-week break from resistance training on long-term muscle size and strength adaptations. The study compared individuals who trained continuously for 20 weeks to those who trained for 10 weeks, took a 10-week break, and then resumed training for another 10 weeks.
The study included 42 untrained adults (55% men, 45% women) aged 18–40 years. Participants completed a standardized, supervised resistance training program consisting of two whole-body workouts per week. Strength was
Findings:
During the 10-week detraining period, the group that paused training experienced expected declines in muscle size and strength:
- Leg press 1RM decreased by 5.4%
- Biceps curl 1RM decreased by 3.6%
- Vastus lateralis cross sectional area decreased by 9.9%
- Biceps brachii cross sectional area decreased by 7.3%
However, within just 5 weeks of retraining, participants in the periodic training group fully regained lost muscle size and strength, and by the end of the study, there were no significant differences between the groups in overall muscular adaptations. The rate of muscle and strength gains was greater during the retraining period for those who took a break, demonstrating the role of muscle memory in restoring lost adaptations efficiently.
While the findings suggest that taking an extended break from resistance training does not significantly impair long-term progress in untrained individuals, they may not be fully applicable to highly trained individuals with years of resistance training experience. Well-trained individuals may experience greater losses in strength and hypertrophy during prolonged detraining due to their higher baseline levels of muscle mass and neuromuscular efficiency.
Additionally, while periodic training can facilitate rapid regains, continuous training optimizes the time spent making new gains, rather than simply recovering lost adaptations. For those seeking to maximize long-term hypertrophy and strength, maintaining at least a minimal training volume during periods of reduced training availability may be beneficial.