07/28/2017
Posting re-CO and briefing documents
We’ve got a few questions.
Another curious event happened on July 25th at our 2017 – 24 HOA event debrief with Conservation Officer Arthur Hughes and Area Manager Michael Roycroft, from the CNCPP. This meeting is meant to be ‘high-level’ with a promise for detailed information to follow. Here’s some troubling background. In the 2016 debrief meeting, on July 19th, 2016 the Conversation Officer Andy Rees, started the meeting with a statement that said there where 176 infractions sited at the event. He then gave 6 examples. Surprised by this large number and having never, in 20 years, heard numbers like this, we asked for the officer’s notes. His response was NO and if we wanted his notes we would need to go through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA). Curious? Confusing? Troubling?
At this year’s debrief meeting, when asked for Mr. Hughes and Mr. Roycroft’s notes so that we could review and proactively look to see how we would best address any concerns, we received the same response as we had in 2016’s debrief meeting…. NO. Just as an fyi, we did go to the FOIA last year, paid the fee and requested the notes online on July 20th, 2016 and received the following 6 pages of completely redacted information on November 11, 2016.
As the organizer, how are we able to improve or put systems in place to mitigate any issues, with THIS type of feedback? The Alberta Park’s website lists that one of the roles of the Conservation Officer is to mitigate the human and wildlife interaction through “public wildlife education programs”. What better avenue would they have to educate the public then informing us of potential issues and letting us address this with the participants and volunteers of this large mountain biking event? The response two years in a row, leads you to believe that this is NOT their role. Or at least, it is not the role that they would like to exercise with the 24 Hours of Adrenalin.
What is the role of the Conservation Officer?