GROW Horsemanship

GROW Horsemanship I'm Brie Simpson, behaviour consultant, R+ trainer, and the founder of GROW Horsemanship, formerly PATH Equestrian. Please feel free to reach out ❤️

Welfare-focused equine education, discussion, and community

Endorsed Trainer with the WBA

• Behaviour consulting
• R+ lessons (in person and online)

Track-system boarding at Balancing Whispers (Caledon, Ontario) 🇨🇦 PATH was where this work began, but GROW reflects how my understanding and approach have evolved over the years. GROW stands for Guided by Research, Observation & Welfare, the three

pillars that shape everything I do:

Research: keeps the work grounded in evidence and curiosity. Observation: helps us truly see the horse in front of us and respond to them as an individual. Welfare: is the foundation, making sure every choice supports the horse’s physical, emotional, and social needs. I manage Balancing Whispers, one of Canada’s largest track-system facilities, which is home to a healthy mixed herd where horses live in a manner that supports their physical, social, and emotional needs. Designed in collaboration with owner Martine Sudan, who has created a haven for welfare-focused owners and a model for progressive horse management. I’ve hosted clinics and mentorships focused on the equine pain ethogram, consent-based procedures, and welfare-based care, supporting owners, professionals, and students in applying science to real-world horse management. I’ve also mentored students from diverse academic and professional backgrounds, including veterinary and graduate students, as well as co-op placements and horse owners seeking hands-on experience in welfare-based training and management. I’m an Endorsed Trainer with the World Bitless Association, a recognition that holds deep meaning for me because it reflects years of learning, reflection, and dedication to welfare-led, evidence-based horsemanship. Very few trainers hold this recognition, and I feel deeply honoured to be part of that community. GROW Horsemanship is about creating a welfare-focused community, a place where questions are welcome, science meets empathy, and education is meant to empower, not judge.

Track systems are not simply outdoor board.They are a management system.The fencing is the easy part, though it’s certai...
06/20/2026

Track systems are not simply outdoor board.

They are a management system.

The fencing is the easy part, though it’s certainly not the cheap part.

The real work is the daily manure removal, grass management, resource management, herd management, and ongoing maintenance that keeps the system functioning.

Many track systems are intentionally designed to encourage movement and reduce unrestricted access to rich pasture for horses requiring weight management or those with metabolic concerns. That means grass management becomes a major part of the workload. In many cases, owners are actively mowing, removing, or controlling grass rather than simply turning horses out and letting nature take over.

A lot of people compare track systems to traditional outdoor board, but they are often comparing two very different management styles. The environment may be outdoors, but the level of planning, labour, and day to day management can be substantially higher.

A track system is only as good as its management.

One of the most impressive traits in any educator is the ability to say, “I don’t know.”Not because they lack knowledge....
06/18/2026

One of the most impressive traits in any educator is the ability to say, “I don’t know.”

Not because they lack knowledge.

Usually it’s the opposite.

The more someone learns, the more they realize how much they don’t know.

There can be a lot of pressure to have an answer for everything. To sound confident. To pick a side immediately. To speak in absolutes.

But some of the smartest people I’ve learned from are the ones who are comfortable saying:

“I don’t know.”

“I used to think differently.”

“That’s a good question. Let me look into it.”

“I haven’t seen enough evidence to have an opinion on that yet.”

This is something I’ve been actively working on myself.

Not every topic requires us to immediately take a stance. Sometimes the best thing we can do is learn more before deciding what we think and where our positions are.

I find all these to be signs of intellectual honesty.

I’d much rather learn from someone who is willing to admit uncertainty than someone who is certain about everything.

Because the goal shouldn’t be to always be right. The goal should be to keep learning.

And sometimes learning starts with three simple words:

“I don’t know.”

It’s common to see a horse lick, chew, or yawn in a training session and hear that it means they’ve “processed” what jus...
06/16/2026

It’s common to see a horse lick, chew, or yawn in a training session and hear that it means they’ve “processed” what just happened. The belief comes from a real observation: these behaviours often appear when a horse shifts from a heightened state back toward calm.

The link here is the nervous system. Licking, chewing, and yawning are behaviours connected to the parasympathetic nervous system. Sometimes they appear after the sympathetic nervous system has been activated and then deactivated, as the body returns to recovery and calm. Other times they show up when the horse is already relaxed, as part of maintaining parasympathetic activity. In both cases these behaviours are not proof of learning. They are indicators of state.

When horses are in a calmer, parasympathetic state, learning and memory formation are more likely. That is the connection people noticed. The behaviour is not the learning. The behaviour is a window into the horse’s physiology that supports learning.



A common scenario in traditional training might look like this:

1. Pressure is applied.

2. The horse tries different options to find relief.

3. The horse finds the behaviour that makes the pressure stop.

4. The moment pressure stops, the horse experiences relief.

5. As the sympathetic response deactivates, parasympathetic activity re-engages and the body returns toward calm.

This is often the moment we see licking, chewing, yawning, or blowing out.

What is really happening in that moment is a combination of two things:

1. “If I do this, the pressure stops.”

2. “Thank goodness the pressure finally stopped.”

Quick summary: In this example, the horse licks and chews at the same time it discovers the behaviour that turns pressure off, so it is easy to misread that as understanding the lesson. The licking and chewing is not about the content of the lesson. It reflects the horse’s learning state. It tells us the nervous system is down-regulating after arousal and that what preceded the release was aversive or stressful enough to require regulation.



Licking, chewing, and yawning don’t only appear after stress. They can also show up when a horse is already relaxed, quietly resting, dozing, or digesting. In those moments the behaviours are part of maintaining parasympathetic activity, not recovering from stress.

And this is why I always pause and ask: what came before the lick, chew, blow out, shake, or yawn? Was there a stressor the horse is coming down from, or are they already calm and connected? Because that context tells you whether you’re seeing regulation or maintenance, and that difference changes everything about how you interpret what’s happening.



Why does this matter?

It might seem like splitting hairs. After all, if the horse looks calmer and shows licking and chewing, isn’t that what counts? But the nuance matters because how we interpret behaviour shapes how we train.

When we mistake these behaviours for signs of understanding, we stop looking for what caused them. We might unintentionally celebrate the moment a horse finally found relief instead of asking why they needed relief in the first place.

If we reward ourselves for creating just enough stress to trigger a lick and chew, we risk normalizing a cycle of tension and release. Over time this can make stress an expected part of learning, something the horse must endure to find comfort.

But learning doesn’t require distress. A horse in a regulated, safe, parasympathetic state is not only capable of learning, they’re primed for it. When we see licking and chewing for what it really is, a reflection of the nervous system, we can shift our focus toward the conditions that keep the horse regulated from the start.

When we start viewing behaviour through the lens of physiology, our priorities shift. Because when calm becomes the baseline, learning becomes effortless.

06/15/2026

One of my favourite enrichment activities for stall rest and it also works outside!

Cheap.

Easy to make.

Please supervise. Some horses understand the assignment, others try to eat the twine.





People sometimes point out that enrichment items like hay balls, treat balls, hanging toys, scratching posts, and anythi...
06/15/2026

People sometimes point out that enrichment items like hay balls, treat balls, hanging toys, scratching posts, and anything colourful aren’t “natural.”

And they’re right.

A horse would never encounter a treat ball in the wild.

A scratching post isn’t a tree.

A hanging rope with carrots and celery is “unnatural” as it gets.

But the goal of enrichment isn’t to recreate nature perfectly.

The goal is to encourage species appropriate behaviour.

A scratching post may not be a tree, but it allows horses to scratch and groom themselves.

A hay ball may not be a patch of grass, but it encourages movement, foraging, and food-seeking behaviour.

A hanging toy may not be a bush or tree, but it encourages browsing, lip manipulation, exploration, and investigation.

The enrichment itself is artificial.
The behaviour it encourages is not.

When I create enrichment, I’m not usually asking:

“What object can I give my horse?”

I’m asking:

“What behaviour am I trying to encourage?”

Foraging.
Browsing.
Exploration.
Movement.
Social interaction.
CHOICE.

Because good enrichment isn’t just about keeping horses busy (though that’s sometimes a part of the equation)

It’s about creating opportunities for horses to do more horse things in environments that are often very different than natural ones.

So yes, some enrichment looks unnatural.

But let’s be honest, owning horses, our expectations and majority of the environments we keep them in aren’t “natural.”

What matters is whether we’re creating opportunities for horses to express species appropriate behaviours.

Anyone claiming they are the ONLY person who can fix your horse is a red flag.Anyone claiming there is only one way to h...
06/14/2026

Anyone claiming they are the ONLY person who can fix your horse is a red flag.

Anyone claiming there is only one way to help horses is a red flag.

Horses are individuals.

Different trainers, veterinarians, farriers, body workers, management changes, and training approaches can all be part of the solution.

Good professionals don’t make you dependent on them or isolate you from other sources of knowledge.

They teach you how to think, how to observe, and how to make informed decisions for your horse.

Disagreement is not always a bad thing.

In fact, some of the most valuable learning happens when knowledgeable people view the same problem differently. Hearing different perspectives allows us to ask better questions, challenge our assumptions, and make more informed decisions for our horses.

I become concerned whenever someone is discouraged from seeking second opinions, learning from multiple sources, or engaging with professionals who hold different viewpoints.

If someone’s entire business model relies on convincing you that every other professional is wrong, that they possess a unique solution no one else understands, that ONLY their training or handling method is ethical, and that they alone have the answer, that’s not expertise.

It’s a huge red flag.

Your horse is not trying to figure out who the leader is.They’re trying to figure out what works.Before anyone jumps int...
06/13/2026

Your horse is not trying to figure out who the leader is.

They’re trying to figure out what works.

Before anyone jumps into the comments, this isn’t because I think “leadership” is inherently a bad word.

The problem is that in the horse world, people often use the same word to mean completely different things.

Some people say “leadership” and mean:

• Being predictable
• Providing clear guidance
• Helping the horse feel safe
• Setting consistent and clear boundaries

Others say “leadership” and mean:

• Compliance
• Submission
• The horse accepting a higher “rank” or “boss”

Those are VERY different concepts.

And that’s why I personally tend to avoid the word.

Not because I disagree with the first list.

But because words like clarity, predictability, communication, and consistency tell me much more about what is ACTUALY happening.

When a horse is struggling, I don’t find myself asking whether they need more “leadership” or if I need to be more of a boss.

I find myself asking:

Do they understand what I’m asking?

Is my timing clear?

Have I taught the skill I’m expecting?

Am I reinforcing the behaviour I want?

Because horses aren’t navigating “office politics”.

They’re navigating consequences, experiences, and information.

The clearer we are, the easier it becomes for them to succeed.

Bits and Safety: What Does the Research Actually Say?There’s a very common belief in the horse world that bits make ridi...
06/12/2026

Bits and Safety: What Does the Research Actually Say?

There’s a very common belief in the horse world that bits make riding safer. Most of us were taught this from our earliest lessons, and it gets repeated so often that it starts to feel like an established fact.

That belief showed up again and again this week. When I previously wrote this post I had attended an R+ summit a space full of thoughtful, well respected people in our industry, and the idea that bits are a safety feature and provide more control, was mentioned in a way that suggested it was supported by research.

Now we are seeing it everywhere on social media right now, due to the bridleless competition, In a wide variety of spaces.

And I think it’s important to recognize that this isn’t just a “traditional” belief. It shows up even in modern, evidence-based circles.

Because of that, I wanted to look at this from all angles. I went searching specifically for peer reviewed studies that support the claim that bits increase rider safety or reduce safety risks compared to bitless equipment.

I wasn’t able to find ANY.

There are studies on bridles, rein tension, rider perceptions and pressure distribution. Some of these papers get referenced to defend bit use. But none of them demonstrate increased safety because of the bit.

The only study that directly compared rider safety between bitted and bitless horses found no difference in safety outcomes at all. Horses ridden without a bit did not create more safety concerns, did not show more risk, and did not demonstrate a disadvantage.

So before we keep repeating the belief that “bits equal safety,” especially in spaces that value evidence, I think it’s worth acknowledging that this claim doesn’t appear in the scientific literature. It seems to come more from tradition and habit than from data.

The peer reviewed evidence available right now simply doesn’t show a safety advantage to using a bit. Grounding our safety conversations in evidence matters, especially in a field that values welfare and clarity. If you’d like to explore the topic further, World Bitless Association has excellent educational resources.

We need to retackle a persistent myth in the horse world.That some breeds “mature faster” and are therefore ready to be ...
06/11/2026

We need to retackle a persistent myth in the horse world.

That some breeds “mature faster” and are therefore ready to be ridden earlier, often starting at 2.

They don’t.
At least not in any meaningful way.
And not SKELETALLY.

Yes, there is variation in how horses grow. Some fill out sooner. Some develop muscle earlier. Some look mature at a young age. But breed does not meaningfully accelerate skeletal maturity.

Across all breeds of horses growth plates follow similar timelines. Their lower limb close within 2–3 years. The spine is the last to mature around 5–6 years old.

There IS research comparing different breeds and it shows differences in how quickly horses grow and fill out, but only small variations in when growth plates actually close.

Those differences are measured in MONTHS (at most), not years.

When posts like this come up, people often point to studies showing that light exercise can be beneficial for young horses. That exercise can easily be done without a rider.

So why do we continuously see people arguing specific breeds can be started earlier than others?

Because early competition is normalized.
Because futurities reward EARLY results.
Because talent and willingness get mistaken for readiness.

None of that changes what is happening with their skeleton.

When horses are started very young, the timeline is rarely set by biology. It’s set by systems that reward speed, turnover, and profit. That’s not development. That’s greed.

Horses can LOOK ready at different ages, even though their skeletal growth is the same. Looking mature and being skeletally mature are not the same thing.

Breed doesn’t change meaningfully skeletal development, and rushing timelines doesn’t change their biology.

06/10/2026

In honour of our new scratching posts, here is my absolute favourite enrichment video 😅





Address

Mountainview Road
Caledon East, ON
L7K2G2

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when GROW Horsemanship posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to GROW Horsemanship:

Share