GROW Horsemanship

GROW Horsemanship I'm Brie Simpson, behaviour consultant, R+ trainer, and the founder of GROW Horsemanship, formerly PATH Equestrian. Please feel free to reach out ❤️

Welfare-focused equine education, discussion, and community

Endorsed Trainer with the WBA

• Behaviour consulting
• R+ lessons (in person and online)

Track-system boarding at Balancing Whispers (Caledon, Ontario) 🇨🇦 PATH was where this work began, but GROW reflects how my understanding and approach have evolved over the years. GROW stands for Guided by Research, Observation & Welfare, the three

pillars that shape everything I do:

Research: keeps the work grounded in evidence and curiosity. Observation: helps us truly see the horse in front of us and respond to them as an individual. Welfare: is the foundation, making sure every choice supports the horse’s physical, emotional, and social needs. I manage Balancing Whispers, one of Canada’s largest track-system facilities, which is home to a healthy mixed herd where horses live in a manner that supports their physical, social, and emotional needs. Designed in collaboration with owner Martine Sudan, who has created a haven for welfare-focused owners and a model for progressive horse management. I’ve hosted clinics and mentorships focused on the equine pain ethogram, consent-based procedures, and welfare-based care, supporting owners, professionals, and students in applying science to real-world horse management. I’ve also mentored students from diverse academic and professional backgrounds, including veterinary and graduate students, as well as co-op placements and horse owners seeking hands-on experience in welfare-based training and management. I’m an Endorsed Trainer with the World Bitless Association, a recognition that holds deep meaning for me because it reflects years of learning, reflection, and dedication to welfare-led, evidence-based horsemanship. Very few trainers hold this recognition, and I feel deeply honoured to be part of that community. GROW Horsemanship is about creating a welfare-focused community, a place where questions are welcome, science meets empathy, and education is meant to empower, not judge.

I am increasingly worried about owners becoming afraid to set boundaries with their horses.And I know more extreme pages...
09/13/2026

I am increasingly worried about owners becoming afraid to set boundaries with their horses.

And I know more extreme pages are using examples of this as a way to dismiss entire methods of training. But I don’t think pretending these examples don’t exist helps anyone.

I think many of the people who are afraid to set boundaries are coming from a genuinely good place.

They want to be kind. They want to listen to their horses. They don’t want to use fear, intimidation or unnecessary force. They’re learning about other methods, getting snippets of the science, and questioning a lot of what they were traditionally taught about horses.

I think all of that is INCREDIBLY valuable.

But increasingly, I’m seeing videos where a horse does something genuinely dangerous and the person handling them seems hesitant to intervene or react. And I’m not going to pretend these examples don’t exist just because they’ve become a bit of a “meme” among the cowboys.

A horse aggressively drives into their space. A horse swings its hindquarters and kicks out toward them. A horse lunges or strikes at them. A horse barges through them with enough force to knock them down.

And sometimes I get the impression that people are genuinely unsure what they’re “ALLOWED” to do in that moment without betraying everything they’ve learned about agency, choice and reducing the use of force.

That scares me.

Because you are allowed to protect yourself. Not just allowed. You NEED to.

My horse cannot bite or kick me. My horse cannot run through me. My horse cannot aggressively crowd me and make my space dangerous.

Those are hard boundaries we should all have.

That doesn’t mean I need to hurt my horse to teach them. It doesn’t mean I need to punish every mistake, establish dominance or routinely use force to maintain those boundaries.

But if a horse is ACTIVELY putting me in danger, safety becomes the immediate priority.

And I think we’re starting to muddy the line between using force as a training method and physically intervening in an immediate safety situation.

Those are NOT the same thing.

I’ve had this conversation many times. If a horse is about to kick me and I have to move them away from me, that is not equivalent to routinely hitting a horse to shape behaviour. If a horse is coming through me and I have to physically stop them, that is not equivalent to using heavy pressure or punishment as my training system.

An emergency response is NOT a training methodology.

Once everyone is safe, THEN we can look at what happened.

Why did the horse behave that way? Do they have aggression I don’t know about? Were they frightened? Frustrated? Over-aroused? In pain? Was food creating conflict? Did I put them in a situation they weren’t prepared for? Have I actually taught them an appropriate alternative behaviour? Is there something about my management or training that needs to change?

Those questions matter enormously, because simply stopping dangerous behaviour in the moment doesn’t teach the horse what we want them to do instead. And this is where I think another distinction is important.

Not everything we call a “boundary” actually is one.

“My horse cannot bite me” is a boundary.
“My horse should stand quietly beside me” is an expectation.

“My horse cannot run through me” is a boundary.
“My horse should walk politely beside me on a loose lead” is a behaviour I need to teach.

If a horse isn’t meeting a behavioural expectation, that doesn’t automatically mean they’re “disrespecting my boundaries.” Sometimes we need to stop framing training problems as boundary problems and simply train the behaviour better.

But when there is an immediate threat to someone’s physical safety, I don’t want people standing there wondering whether protecting themselves is “ethical.”

You can believe deeply in agency. You can give your horse meaningful choices. You can listen when they say no. You can train however you like. You can reject dominance-based explanations and unnecessary force.

AND you can still have hard boundaries around your physical safety.

I think we need to be careful that in trying to move away from an industry that has normalized far too much force, we don’t swing so far in the other direction that people become afraid to intervene when they genuinely need to.

Showing your horse kindness should NEVER mean giving up your safety.

Understanding why a horse kicked doesn’t require you to get kicked.

I’m trying to stop using the word “consent” when I talk about horses.I’ve used it for probably close to 10 years, so it ...
09/13/2026

I’m trying to stop using the word “consent” when I talk about horses.

I’ve used it for probably close to 10 years, so it still slips out. I’ve actually been really conscious of it with the Enzo series because it’s SO ingrained in my vocabulary.

But the more I read, the less I think it’s the right word.

Consent does show up in animal literature. I’m not saying it doesn’t. There’s actually quite a bit of discussion around whether the word can or should apply to animals. I just don’t think I “need” it anymore.

A lot of what I have called “consent” over the years is better described through agency, choice and control. Assent and dissent are also being discussed in this area, particularly when we’re talking about an animal’s willingness to participate or disengage.

And I really think those distinctions are VERY important.

Consent carries an expectation of understanding what is being agreed to that we simply can’t establish in a horse. I don’t need to make that claim to believe that a horse should have as much agency as we can reasonably give them.

I also think consent has become such a loaded word in the horse world that it can completely take over the conversation. As soon as someone says a horse “consented”, people start arguing about whether horses CAN consent.

And I kind of get it.

Consent means something pretty significant when we’re talking about humans. Using the same word for a horse who chooses to participate in an interaction is ALWAYS going to create arguments about what the horse actually understands, especially in an industry so focused on control.

Then we spend all our time arguing about the word instead of talking about whether the horse had any meaningful control over what was happening.

I also don’t want to use “consent” simply because it sounds nicer, more compassionate or more relational. If there’s a more accurate way for me to describe what happened, I’d rather use it.

None of this changes how I train. It’s me realizing that the word I’ve been using for years doesn’t really say what I thought it did.

And I think it’s worth questioning why we’re so attached to “consent” in the first place.

If what we actually mean is agency, choice, control, assent or dissent, why not say that?

We don’t lose anything by being more accurate. We can still prioritize the horse’s voice, give them meaningful choices, listen when they disengage and give them as much control over their lives as reasonably possible.

Especially in a horse world where control over horses is so normalized, I think these distinctions are extremely important and I’d rather spend our time talking about how much agency a horse actually has than arguing over whether we can call their participation “consent.”

There’s a much bigger conversation there, and I don’t want the word consent getting in the way of it.

There is something happening in the horse world that I think we need to talk about more seriously.People are scared to s...
09/12/2026

There is something happening in the horse world that I think we need to talk about more seriously.

People are scared to speak up.

Not just uncomfortable. Not just worried about “barn drama.” Genuinely scared of what can happen to them personally, professionally and financially if they publicly talk about something they witnessed involving a horse.

We see this at the highest levels of equestrian sport. Whistleblowers come forward with welfare concerns and find themselves threatened, targeted, professionally isolated or having their own character and motives picked apart.

And everyone else watches.

I don’t think we fully appreciate what that does to an industry. Every time somebody speaks up and their life becomes significantly harder because of it, everyone watching gets the message.

“Maybe I shouldn’t say anything.”

And this doesn’t just happen at the elite level.

There are barns with reputations that exist almost entirely through whispers. Trainers that people will privately tell you never to send a horse to. Veterinary professionals people will privately tell you they believe are abusive.

I’ve had clients come from facilities where they say medication wasn’t given, their horses were used without their permission, they didn’t have adequate access to water, or there were other serious concerns about their care.

But publicly?

NOTHING.

People are too scared to discuss these things outside of their circles. They’re scared to write reviews. They’re scared to put their name behind what they witnessed. Sometimes they’re scared to even talk about what happened.

And I mean genuine fear.

Fear of legal action. Fear of financial consequences. Fear of professional retaliation. Fear of what happens to their livelihood or reputation if they become the person who spoke publicly.

So they stay quiet.

And then the next horse person looks on Google and sees nothing. They see a perfectly curated social media page. They have absolutely no idea what is being said behind closed doors.

And the quiet cycle repeats.

I understand why. So people get their horses out and move on.

And PLEASE don’t tell me that the solution is simply to report it instead. I HAVE reported things. I know plenty of people who have reported things.

And most of the time, nothing happens.

Over a decade ago, I was one of the people who left quietly because of things I witnessed. They made me uncomfortable then, but knowing what I know today, I would consider some of what I witnessed animal abuse.

There are horses from that time that I still think about. The regret of not being able to do more, and the grief I still carry over some of it, genuinely keeps me awake sometimes.

So I understand the silence more than I wish I did.
What I can’t accept is pretending this culture of silence doesn’t have consequences. Of course it does.

When people see what happens to someone who speaks publicly, they think twice about doing it themselves. When people report something and nothing happens, eventually they stop believing reporting will accomplish anything. And when someone gets their horse out and quietly moves on, whatever happened becomes another story passed around privately that the next person will probably never hear.

There is something SO deeply wrong with that.

Because at the heart of all of this is a living animal experiencing the consequences. They depend entirely on humans being willing to notice, document and speak for them.

And we have created an industry where speaking can feel much more dangerous than staying silent.

That should horrify us.

I usually try to end posts like this with something productive. A call to action. Something we can do better.

I don’t have one today.
I just feel incredibly disheartened by this.

09/12/2026

Project Enzo: Ear Desensitization

Enzo came to me with significant wounds on his ears. They’re healing beautifully, but they’ve been painful and he has every reason to protect them.

Mule ears are incredibly sensitive to begin with. Here’s how I’m working on making touch and handling more comfortable for him.

Apparently we need to talk about stealing content.I have genuinely never made a post like this before, but I’m so disapp...
09/11/2026

Apparently we need to talk about stealing content.

I have genuinely never made a post like this before, but I’m so disappointed by how this was handled.

I found out today that someone had copied one of my posts and reposted it as their own.

Not shared it. Not quoted a section of it and credited me. Copied my work and posted it to their own page.

I commented on the post saying that I was disappointed and asking why they would steal the post rather than simply share it.

I was blocked.

And honestly, that made this feel so much worse.

I spend a ridiculous amount of my free time creating educational content for this page. I don’t put it behind a paywall. I WANT people to share it. I want these conversations to reach people outside of my little corner of the horse world.

There is literally a share button.

Sharing someone’s work helps the person who created it. It sends people back to their page, allows them to participate in the discussion their work created, and gives them credit for the time they spent putting it together.

Copying their words onto your own page does none of that.

And blocking the original creator when they notice doesn’t somehow make those words yours.

Please share my posts. Send them to your friends. Talk about them. Disagree with them. Build conversations from them.

But please don’t copy my work, present it as your own, and then block me when I ask about it.

I really shouldn’t have to ask for that. I put an enormous amount of time into creating free educational content for this community. I don’t ask for anything in return for it.

Asking you not to take my work and pass it off as your own is not a big ask.

—-

UPDATE: It looks like the copied post has been taken down. I’m not sure whether the person removed it themselves or whether it was removed after I submitted the copyright infringement report to Meta, but either way, I’m incredibly relieved.

And I genuinely cannot believe the support you guys gave me. I was pretty upset about this earlier, and the amount of kindness, support and people standing up for my work absolutely blew me away.

I really didn’t expect that response. Thank you. Seriously. ❤️

Unpopular opinion time: We are not entitled to riding our horses, regardless of the reason we do.Not as owners.Not as th...
09/10/2026

Unpopular opinion time:

We are not entitled to riding our horses, regardless of the reason we do.

Not as owners.
Not as therapy programs.
Not as people who need them for our health.
Not as the people financially benefitting from the horse performing.

And not because the horse is expensive, trained, or labeled in a way that makes us feel justified.

Labels don’t create entitlement or place our needs above another living being.

I have seen incredible therapy programs that truly put the horse first.
I have worked with high level riders who prioritize their horses and their care above showing.
I have seen lesson programs that value the horse over the income they bring in.

But that’s not always the case.

And when we start using labels to justify our access to a horse’s body for riding, it becomes easier to ignore the moments that say we shouldn’t.

When I say “at the expense of the horse,” I’m talking about moments where the horse is not equipped, physically or mentally, for what’s being asked of them.

Pushing through pain, discomfort, or fatigue. Ignoring tension, resistance, or shutdown. BUT CONTINUING because of schedule, money, expectation, or want instead of what the horse is actually capable of that day.

But our wants do not matter above all. When we have another living being in our equation.

And it ALWAYS comes back to this for me.

Whether it’s lessons, therapy, showing, or personal enjoyment, it should never be done at the expense of the horse.

And I think that’s where this post shifts from something most people would agree with
to something far less comfortable in practice.

Because once we add in words like therapy, high value, or expensive, that line can start to feel negotiable.

And it shouldn’t be.

09/09/2026

Why does R+ cause such a visceral reaction on all sides?

I genuinely don’t understand why on earth it’s so hard to have a conversation about R+ on this page.

I talk about its issues ALL the time. Poor food mechanics, over-arousal, coercive use of food, inexperienced trainers, safety issues, things I think the R+ community needs to do better.

But in a sea of posts offering criticism, nuance and tips, I make one saying, “Hey, this is actually a really useful way to train, here are some things it can do well,” and suddenly you’d think I was at your barn personally forcing you to train this way.
I’m not.

You do not have to use R+. You don’t even have to like it. Talking about what R+ can do well is not an attack on the way you train.

And yes, this absolutely happens from the other side too.

I’ve lost R+ followers for criticizing R+. I’ve had people get defensive because I’ve talked about problems within the community or pointed out that R+ can be used poorly, unsafely or even coercively.

Criticizing how R+ is being used is not an attack on R+ either.

This whole thing is SO bizarre.

I think both sides have become so used to being attacked by the other that we’re anticipating the argument before it even happens.

Someone who trains conventionally sees a post about R+ and is already bracing to be told they’re abusive, their horse is shut down, or everything they’ve ever learned about horses is wrong.

Someone who trains with R+ sees criticism of it and is already bracing for “treat dispenser,” “cookie pusher,” “that’s not real horsemanship,” or being told their horse is going to become dangerous.

And to be fair, those associations didn’t come from nowhere. I’ve seen an unbelievable amount of toxic nonsense from BOTH sides of this conversation over the years.

But I think we’ve gotten so used to those arguments that we’ve lost the ability to separate what someone is actually saying from the argument we EXPECT them to make next.

So we respond to the anticipated attack instead. And then, surprise, the other person gets defensive too.

It feels like there’s no room to just talk about R+ for what it is. I can believe in R+, use it every day and still criticize things happening within it. And I can talk about what it does really well without that being a criticism of everyone who trains differently.

I’m attaching a pile of my own training reels to this post because I genuinely think some people don’t believe you can actually train a horse with R+ beyond a handful of tricks.

Which is absolutely wild to me.

These are horses I have actually trained using R+. Not perfect training, not the only way these behaviours could have been taught, just actual examples of what training with R+ can look like.

And yes, if you go through them looking for holes, you’ll find them. You’ll find holes in my R+ training. You’ll find holes in my R- training too. And I’m sure I could find plenty in yours.

That’s okay. No one is perfect. We should be able to look critically at training without needing the entire method, or ourselves, to be perfect.

Talking about what R+ does well doesn’t invalidate how you train. Talking about its problems doesn’t invalidate R+ either.

Maybe we need to get a little better at responding to the conversation we are ACTUALLY HAVING instead of the fight we’ve already had a hundred times before.

At the end of the day, R+ is a learning quadrant.

That’s it.

And it’s wild to me that simply mentioning one quadrant of operant conditioning can make parts of the horse world practically froth at the mouth.

We should be able to talk about where it works, where it doesn’t, how it’s being used well and where people are messing it up without every conversation turning into a fight over which “side” you’re on.

R+ really does NOT need to be this emotionally loaded.

One of the biggest reasons people avoid Positive Reinforcement is because they’re worried about creating a muggy, frustr...
09/09/2026

One of the biggest reasons people avoid Positive Reinforcement is because they’re worried about creating a muggy, frustrated or food-aggressive horse.

THIS IS A VALID CONCERN.

Positive reinforcement can absolutely create muggy, frustrated, or even food-aggressive horses. IF NOT DONE PROPERLY.

Pressure and release can absolutely create shut-down, fearful, anxious, or aggressive horses.

Neither outcome is inevitable. Both are possible when training lacks clarity, consistency, or good mechanics.

Fortunately, there are a large number of things we can do to reduce the likelihood of mugging, frustration and aggression.

1. Have clear start and end of session signals.

Horses benefit from knowing when training has begun and when it has ended. That predictability matters, especially at the beginning. They don’t have to constantly guess whether reinforcement is available because the context is clear.

2. Teach context.

Not every interaction needs to be a training session.

Sometimes we’re shaping a new behaviour. Sometimes we’re working on behaviours already under stimulus control. Sometimes we’re simply sharing space together in the pasture.

Horses are incredibly good at learning context. Clear contexts create clear expectations.

3. Reinforce calm.

One of the most important behaviours to reinforce is doing NOTHING.

Standing quietly, “respecting” personal space, waiting calmly, and remaining relaxed around food are all behaviours worth reinforcing.

Calm behaviour around food doesn’t happen by accident. It’s taught, reinforced and maintained.

4. Reinforce away from your body.

One rule I repeat over and over in the beginning is:

Food goes to the horse. The horse doesn’t come to the food.

Food doesn’t always need to come from your hand or directly beside you. Reinforce the position you WANT, use a feed pan, or reinforce where you ultimately want the horse to be.

This helps prevent horses from learning that crowding you is the best strategy, because crowding never results in reinforcement.

5. Teach boundaries AS behaviours.

Rather than only correcting a horse for being “pushy,” teach the behaviours you want instead.

Stand here.
Wait.
Put your head here.
Stand calmly.

Boundaries ARE behaviours, and like any other behaviour, they can be taught and reinforced.

6. Be mindful of your choice of reinforcement.

People often call this “treat training,” but most of us aren’t actually training with treats. The goal is to use the lowest value reinforcer that still effectively reinforces the behaviour. Sometimes that’s hay pellets. Sometimes it’s chopped forage. Often it’s part of the horse’s normal daily ration.

Higher-value food can increase arousal, especially early in training, which is one reason people sometimes run into problems with mugging.

It also answers one of the most common concerns: “Won’t my horse get fat from all those treats?” In many cases, we’re simply using calories the horse would already be eating.

None of these principles are magic. They’re simply ways of making the training clearer and more predictable for the horse.

The goal isn’t to have a horse following you because you have food. The goal is to have a horse that understands when reinforcement is available, what behaviours earn it, and what is expected in different contexts.

Positive Reinforcement DOESN’T create mugging. Poor application of R+ can.

Just as poor application of pressure can create fear, frustration, or shut-down behaviour.

The answer isn’t avoiding a learning process.

The answer is understanding the principles that make good training possible.

Curious about trying food in your horse training?If elephants, tigers, and even hippos can learn complex husbandry behav...
09/08/2026

Curious about trying food in your horse training?
If elephants, tigers, and even hippos can learn complex husbandry behaviours with food… why not horses?

🐘 African Elephants: The largest land mammal, have been trained to take injections and many other husbandry behaviours through clicker training.

🐻 Bears: With a bite force of over 1,200 PSI, have been trained to have their teeth cleaned and to give hair and blood samples.

🐯 Tigers: With claws 4 inches long, have been trained to back up their tails into their handler for injections and to accept fly spray on their ears.

🦓 Zebras: Who can kill lions with a single kick, have been trained to voluntarily walk onto a scale, stand still, and get weighed.

🦛 Hippos: The world’s deadliest mammal, have been trained to have their teeth brushed and undergo dental checks.

🦧 Chimpanzees: With 5 times the arm strength of a human male, have been taught to get their temperature checked and teeth inspected.

🦒 Giraffes: The tallest mammal in the world, have been trained to have their hooves handled and trimmed.

These behaviours are taught by pairing a specific action with something the animal values, often food. This helps them understand exactly what’s being asked and makes participating in their own care a positive experience. Training begins with small, achievable steps and builds gradually to more complex skills.

In many cases, the first sessions are done in protected contact, where a safe barrier allows the animal to feel comfortable and the trainer to work without risk. This isn’t unique to zoos, most R+ horse trainers also start this way.

When training without protected contact, the first priority is not the behaviour, it’s teaching CALM, thoughtful interaction around food.

We have horses trained for liberty injections (intramuscular or subcutaneous without restraint), taking oral syringes, placing their hooves on stands, showing their teeth and allowing tongue/mouth handling for daily checks, accepting eye care, volunteering for bandage changes and wound treatment, and even asking for fly spray.

If these larger, stronger, and more dangerous animals can be trained safely with food, imagine what’s possible for your horse. 🐴✨

Want to see these behaviours in action? I’ve linked real-life examples in the first comment.

Inspired by Doggie Drawings by Lili Chin.

I hate to say this out loud, but I think we need to talk about something happening within the Positive Reinforcement (R+...
09/07/2026

I hate to say this out loud, but I think we need to talk about something happening within the Positive Reinforcement (R+) horse training world.

I’m seeing people with VERY little practical horse training experience learn the theory of R+ and move remarkably quickly into calling themselves trainers and taking client horses. I’m also seeing complete beginners take on inexperienced horses using food with little to no guidance from someone who actually has experience training horses.

And before anyone says it, YES, I know we are under an unfair microscope.

Nobody looks at the worst application of R− and decides it represents everyone who uses pressure and release. R+ does not get the same grace. A horse trained with food gets pushy, confused, extremely over-aroused or develops dangerous behaviour and suddenly it’s “See? This is what happens when you train horses with treats.”

I understand why we get defensive about this, but I’m seeing it often enough that I don’t think we should ignore it.

One of the things I love about R+ is how tangible the science is. You can learn about reinforcement, shaping, timing and criteria and actually understand WHY behaviour is changing.

But I worry that understanding the science can make people feel more prepared to apply it than they ACTUALLY are.

You can understand reinforcement incredibly well and still have poor timing, accidentally build frustration, set criteria badly or not know what to do when a horse becomes extremely over-aroused or confused.

We generally don’t hand a beginner rider a green horse and tell them to figure it out. Someone learning to start horses usually has someone experienced teaching them. Yet I regularly see complete beginners teaching inexperienced horses with R+ completely on their own and essentially winging it.

Sometimes that goes beautifully, and I’m definitely not saying everyone needs to hire a professional trainer to use R+. I just don’t think we talk enough about how much practical skill there still is to learn.

And then some people make the jump into taking client horses.

I’ve seen horses become extremely over-aroused, frustrated and confused. I’ve seen serious, dangerous behaviours develop while the person training didn’t have enough experience to recognize what was happening early enough to change course.

I see versions of it online too. R+ demonstrations where horses are chasing handlers, pinning their ears or doing behaviours with a TON of tension, and somehow none of that is part of the conversation.

Other horse people see it too, and instead of questioning the individual training, the TOOL gets blamed.

More often than I want to admit, I’ve had local R− trainers approach me after encountering horses previously trained with food that have developed dangerous behaviours. I’m one of relatively few R+ trainers in the area, so sometimes I’m the person they ask about it.

What worries me is that their experience with one poorly trained horse can become part of what they think R+ looks like.

Of course horses trained primarily with R− can develop dangerous behaviours too. Poor training happens everywhere. But Positive Reinforcement is still unfamiliar enough to a lot of the horse world that bad examples get used as evidence that the tool itself is the problem.

I WANT R+ to become MORE mainstream. I WANT traditional trainers to be curious about it and consider adding it to their toolbox.

But knowing the science isn’t the end of learning how to train horses. We still need teachers, practical experience and a LOT of time actually developing those skills before taking other people’s horses into training.

I’ve been hesitant to say this because criticism from inside the R+ community can quickly become ammunition against using Positive Reinforcement.

But poor application becoming someone’s reason to write off a really valuable training tool worries me more.

I’m also seeing people step into professional R+ training with VERY little actual horse training experience, and I can’t help but wonder if they would consider themselves ready to train professionally if R+ wasn’t part of the equation.

R+ shouldn’t somehow lower the amount of experience we expect someone to have before they start training horses professionally.

Address

Mountainview Road
Caledon East, ON

Website

, , , https:/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when GROW Horsemanship posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to GROW Horsemanship:

Shortcuts

Share

Category