12/06/2026
G’day all,
Following on from our earlier update, and to answer some of the many questions we have fielded, we want to share further details from our 25 May meeting with TRC — particularly regarding the “options” presented to our club.
Council officers provided a summary of the pathways available to us. Each option results in the divestment of the clubhouse from TRC.
Importantly, retaining the clubhouse as a Council asset is NOT being offered as an option.
This is deeply concerning, as it appears to contradict:
• TRC Ordinary Council Meeting Minutes
• Public media statements from Mayor Marti
• Council’s stated commitment to genuine engagement to explore all options.
Even more concerning is that the options presented would result in sole use of the asset, which directly conflicts the very criteria Council says it used to assess assets — particularly the importance of shared, community-based use.
In simple terms:
👉 The criteria say shared use is important
👉 The options allow the facility into sole use
This raises serious questions about the integrity of the process.
Since February, our club has repeatedly reached out to engage with Council. The 25 May meeting was the first genuine engagement we’ve had.
At that meeting, we were politely asked to provide our preferred option by 30 June.
We believe this timeframe is insufficient, especially given:
• Divestment is the only option being offered
• Council began this review process in 2025
• The implications for our club and the wider community are significant.
We remain committed to working constructively with TRC — but genuine engagement must include real options, not predetermined outcomes.
We appreciate the continued support from our community and will keep you updated.