12/04/2024
It’s a paradox.
Training in Budo is like a zen koan, it’s a puzzle to be solved.
One does not understand such a paradox through “flowery” training, nor can one intellectualise its essence.
This has been the way since ancient times, the study of satsujinken(death sword) and katsujinken(life giving sword) are entwined.
The founder didn’t create “the art of peace” to avoid this paradox, but rather to unravel it.
This is well documented by those Japanese masters that trained with the founder, including Maruyama Sensei.
Aikido is not a dance(Kendal 2017), aikido is very serious, life and death(Kendal 2017) aikido means to risk your life, to give up your life to find the way(Tao) (Byron bay, 2005).
One does not come to aikido to train because they believe they have a heightened sense of consciousness, one comes to aikido to developed a heightened level of consciousness through tanren, through forging the body.
Through learning to kill one learns how to not kill.
Through violence one discovers peace, that is why Aikido is the art of peace, because trained in a certain way, aikido has the capacity to transform the person doing the training.
I extracted from a recent peace by zen master roshi the most important parts, that Budo is a paradox, and that when this paradox is resolved we lose all sense of self, this was the founders message.
Henry Kono stated that the founder would repeatedly enter the dojo angry that the deshi didn’t get it, that “I (Ueshiba), and he (Uke) don’t exist…”
There is no easy, flowery, intellectual way to realise this truth.
One must be forged in the fire of tanren to know, that in Uke exists this truth, that death and life are born together.
Those that avoid the fire cannot resolve this paradox. One who cannot kill is by definition not peaceful, they have no choice but to be that way.
“Some aikido teachers talk a lot about non- violence, but fail to understand this truth. A pacifist is not really a pacifist if he is unable to make a choice between violence and non- violence. A true pacifist is able to kill or maim in the blink of an eye, but at the moment of impending destruction of the enemy he chooses non-violence. He chooses peace. He must be able to make a choice. He must have the genuine ability to destroy his enemy and then choose not to. I have heard this excuse made. "I choose to be a pacifist before learning techniques so I do not need to learn the power of destruction." This shows no comprehension of the mind of the true warrior. This is just a rationalization to cover the fear of injury or hard training. The true warrior who chooses to be a pacifist is willing to stand and die for his principles. People claiming to be pacifists who rationalize to avoid hard training or injury will flee instead of standing and dying for principle. They are just cowards. Only a warrior who has tempered his spirit in conflict and who has confronted himself and his greatest fears can in my opinion make the choice to be a true pacifist."
Yukiyoshi Takamura
There is no path to Ainuke except this path.
Roshi
Although it is an easy thing to talk about “Zen and Swords- manship in oneness,” what type of relationship is possible between an art for killing people and a Way for man to live? What must one do to bring these two things into unity? The matter cannot be solved by intellect alone, nor can the question be answered merely by words. We could say that this apparently absolute contradiction must be resolved naturally out of one’s self, but to actually experience this oneness is not an easy thing. However, no matter how perplexing this problem is, man basically feels a need, or should we say is required, to resolve this apparent paradox………
In Musashi’s life, the art of killing leaped beyond death into myoki, wondrous “play.”
This is not a state in which one can be removed from the idea of killing by mere thought. (That is just talking about it, or intellectualising it)
If that was true, the idea of giving life would be on the same level and could not be more than dualistic thought.
The dualism of “killing” and “giving life” itself must both be killed - and at the same time transcended.
This in terms of the words of Harigaya Sekiun is ainuke (mutual passing). For all people and in all things one must be able to grasp this point, the state in which truth is fulfilled. Why is this possible? Because man can negate negation. In terms of the Hagakure “The Way of the samurai is to die.” In understanding this, man can attain self realization……