19/09/2024
➡ SWIPE FOR MORE INSIGHTS
1️⃣ Comparing the ACT Government's funding for Canberra sports clubs reveals significant disparities. Cricket, through Andrew Barr’s proposed Big Bash League (BBL) team, is set to receive $3 million in establishment funding, while AFL, represented by a non-local team, receives substantial ongoing support. Meanwhile, Canberra United and the Canberra Capitals—key drivers of women's sport—receive considerably less. This raises questions about the fairness of funding, especially when local teams are underfunded.
2️⃣ When looking at funding per game, the GWS Giants, despite not being a local team, receive far more per game than any local team. Canberra United and the Canberra Capitals, receive much less. This stark imbalance needs to be addressed to ensure equity between Canberra’s male and female athletes.
3️⃣ The funding disparity for games played in Canberra is also clear. The GWS Giants receive more per game than local teams, while Canberra United and the Canberra Capitals, which represent the city in national women's leagues, receive minimal support in comparison.
4️⃣ Women’s teams, such as Canberra United and the Canberra Capitals, play the majority of all home games in the ACT, yet receive significantly less funding than men’s teams. While women’s teams in the ACT provide significant value to culture and tourism in the region through more games played in Canberra than men’s teams, their funding per game remains disproportionately low, reflecting a larger issue of inequity.
5️⃣ Finally, comparing national participation rates with ACT Government funding reveals a stark contrast: football/soccer has the highest participation rate in Australia but remains one of the least funded sports in the ACT. In contrast, sports like cricket and AFL, with lower participation rates, receive far more funding. This disparity underscores the need for urgent reform in funding distribution to better support football, which engages a large portion of the community but is significantly underfunded.