15/02/2026
Parramatta Don’t Get to Cry Victim
I know Parramatta Eels fans won’t like this take, that’s fine. But spare me the outrage over Zac Lomax.
Before I go further, credit to Vic Mackey, who first raised this perspective in a Discord chat with the Wests Tigers Faithful lads.
Parramatta acting like they’ve been wronged by the system is rich, especially for a club with one of the more aggressive recent records when it comes to destabilising contracted players.
• Mitchell Moses forced his way out of the Wests Tigers mid-contract.
• Ryan Matterson agitated for a release before, shock me, he landed at Parramatta.
• Midway through 2025, Lachlan Galvin was already being linked to Parramatta, and was spotted having coffee with Mitchell Moses while still contracted elsewhere.
• Parramatta spent a year trying to convince Isaiah Papali'i to backflip on a deal he’d already signed with the Tigers. Brad Arthur admitted it publicly.
• When the Tigers wanted Stefano Utoikamanu early after signing him, Parramatta said no. Their right, absolutely. But you can’t block early movement when it suits you and condemn it when it doesn’t.
And it doesn’t stop there.
When Dylan Brown signs elsewhere, the tone shifts, he’s moved to centre and given the cold shoulder. Ryan Matterson and Bailey Simonsson become surplus to requirements and are publicly shopped around. This is the NRL. It’s transactional. It’s ruthless. Everyone plays the angles.
But when Lomax reassesses his future after the R360 payday collapses, suddenly it’s framed as betrayal. Now we’re meant to believe Parramatta are guardians of contract integrity?
Please.
This isn’t about principle. It’s about leverage. It’s about narrative control. It’s about a club that was happy to free up cap space now trying to recast itself as the aggrieved party because the optics got messy.
From this perspective, unpopular as it may be, Parramatta don’t get to cry foul.
You don’t get to weaponise the system for years and then act shocked when it turns back on you.