11/04/2024
It's been a little bit since a post between travel, real work, and dealing with this garbage. They were served on Oct 30 and have until Nov 19th to file their response (answer or motion to dismiss).
For those of you that have contributed, thank you so much! As a reminder, the contribution policy and link to contribute is here:
https://www.agcclawsuit.com/documents/contribution-policy/
But, this is how it's going. You have a company that gets to sit on a free $11.1MM that homeowners, nor the association, have any *control* over telling me to watch out "because defamation".
In the statement from their attorney, below (the "caution" one), they make a few interesting claims, the best of which is that I claimed to be an attorney. That's easily dispelled with a few questions that result in the outcome of the referenced party being arguably the most incompetent CEO I've heard of or that a little someone sitting under the cover of a billion-dollar plus (and their half-trillion dollar parent) company is simply trying to use an intimidation tactic. Almost makes you wonder why, doesn't it?
If it is the latter, there's a specific class of laws dealing with that called anti-SLAPP laws (strategic lawsuit against public participation). Further, it seems The Club is spreading this "lying" myth to its apologists. Coincidental timing this post was made after that warning was sent? You be the judge.
This gentleman has been so blessed as to go through the sole pre-law curriculum that makes you "know" contract law. Yet in the subsequent comments in the post, used unconstitutional instead of unconscionable and seemingly didn't know the difference between the two. Hopefully he's looked it up by now.
But, in the wise words of Wayne and Garth - Game On.
