07/09/2026
SELF-DEFENCE MUST WORK FOR THE PERSON WHO NEEDS IT.
LEO training cannot be built on the assumption that every officer practises self-defence extensively off duty. Methods must be usable by the average officer - not only by experienced instructors who train regularly.
That starts with understanding what we are teaching, and why.
An officer attempting an arrest alone may suddenly have to defend against an assault. Arrest tactics and self-defence can overlap, but controlling someone for arresting and protecting yourself from immediate harm are different objectives.
The distinction matters in civilian training too. Presenting restraint and arrest methods as the default response to violence can encourage someone to remain in a confrontation when their priority should be reaching safety.
Training must fit the person, their role and the situation they may face.
Self-defence therefore needs clear priorities and simple, adaptable fundamentals: skills that people can learn, remember and apply under pressure.
But simple does not mean effortless.
Even a straightforward skill requires repetition. It must be practised against resistance and applied in situations where the other person does not cooperate.
Before adding another technique, ask whether the person can already use what they have been taught.
Can they recognise the problem, make a decision and act when the situation becomes physical and unpredictable?
Discussion alone cannot answer that.
Take part in realistic scenarios with physical contact, meaningful resistance and decisions to make. Record the exercises. Review your performance honestly.
Where did you hesitate? What worked? What failed? What needs more practice?
Use those findings to improve the training, then test again. Theory should help explain and improve performance, and practical results should challenge our assumptions.
If you cannot apply the fundamentals under pressure, why are you spending your training time on minor details and advanced techniques?
- ESDS