30/05/2019
Some musing on Tai ch'i videos on Youtube. I've been watching a few videos over the last few weeks. It's interesting the range of skill shown by the various practitioners. I'm afraid that, all too often, the practitioners use students who can only be labelled "shills". That is the teacher claims a level of skill that is belied when you see the way they set things up with their students. In effect the student becomes a willing participant in a con job aimed to boost the teacher's ego/bank balance. Here is a good way of spotting the cons. If the student slows down, or stops, and then the teacher "does his/her thing", the teacher is running a con. If you want a comparison look at Wee Kee Jin doing free push hands. (On the School of Central Equilibrium website) Then at Adam Mizner (search for him - he's all over the web). Mizner, clearly, thinks he has a high skill level. But he has complete control of everything at all times.
Unfortunately Mizner claims to come from the same lineage as me. Yet I'm not aware that he has ever been taught by either Master Huang or any of his senior students. There is no mention of any such teacher on his website's pages. I would like to see him up against Wee Kee Jin - but, I suspect, that suggestion would annoy Jin.
Another way of spotting the cons is if the student does something completely unrealistic. For example "going inside" a punch. That means that the student has no idea how to fight. Some teachers illustrate "real techniques" by "blocking inside". And that shows they don't know how to fight either. By "going inside" I mean the student slipping, say, a right jab and moving to the teacher's left. That sets them up for whatever the teacher plans to use their left hand for. An "inside block" is similar. This time the teacher blocks to the left of (say) a right jab and the student doesn't promptly hit them with a left jab.