27/10/2026
π¨ πππ©ππ π¦π’πππππ’π ππ’ππ¦ π’ππ π’π‘ πππ π₯ππ§ππππππ: βππ ππ¦ π§π’ ππππ π!β π³π₯
Sky Sports journalist Kaveh Solhekol has launched a fierce on-air criticism of Sir Jim Ratcliffe, holding the Manchester United co-owner responsible for the clubβs ongoing problems and repeated changes in direction.
Solhekol argued that Ratcliffeβs decision to acquire a minority stake while leaving the Glazer family in control of the clubβs ownership structure has contributed to the situation United now find themselves in.
π£οΈ βI'm going to tell you who's to blame for this situation at the moment. The person to blame is Jim Ratcliffe.β
He questioned Ratcliffeβs leadership and the promise to bring stability to Old Trafford, pointing to the changes in managerial strategy since the INEOS chief became involved in football operations.
π£οΈ βHe's come in and he said, 'I know better than anyone else how to run this club. We're going to do things my way.' And look what it's turned out to be over the past two and a half years.β
π΄ Solhekol criticised the handling of Erik ten Hag, claiming United initially backed the Dutchman before exploring alternatives, only to give him a new contract and then dismiss him after a difficult run of results.
He also questioned the appointment of Ruben Amorim, arguing that United committed to a manager whose tactical system differed significantly from the football they had previously played.
π£οΈ βThey pay a fortune to get him, even though he plays three at the back, a totally different kind of football.β
Solhekol then pointed to the departure of Dan Ashworth, the subsequent backing of Amorim and the eventual decision to part ways with him before Michael Carrick was brought in as interim manager and later given the permanent role.
π₯ The journalist also challenged Ratcliffeβs reported approach to wages, transfer fees and recruitment, arguing that strict limits could prevent United from competing for established top-level players.
He cited potential targets such as Mateus Fernandes, Elliot Anderson, Harry Kane and Declan Rice as examples of the calibre of players United could struggle to sign under such restrictions.
π£οΈ Solhekolβs conclusion was blunt: βSo this is Jim Ratcliffe's way of doing things. So he is to blame for this situation.β
π΄ The criticism adds to the growing debate over who is responsible for Manchester Unitedβs decline. While managers and players have faced their share of blame, supporters are increasingly questioning the decisions being made at the very top of the club.
π π₯πππ¦, ππ’ π¬π’π¨ πππ₯ππ πͺππ§π πππ©ππ π¦π’πππππ’π? Is Sir Jim Ratcliffe the main problem at Manchester United, or does the blame need to be shared across the entire club? π₯π