04/05/2021
PETITION RESPONSE FROM SORROW
Below is the letter we sent in to Mr Alan Bently Principal Rights of Way Officer at GCC. It takes issue with various points made in his response to our petition, and clarifies locations about which he was unclear.
We received an email acknowledgement over the weekend and will be hearing from Mr Bently again in the next couple of weeks.
Dear Mr Bently,
Apologies for the long time that has elapsed since receiving your reply to our petition and thank you for your response.
However, we were very disappointed by the letter’s tone and some of its content. We found it rather dismissive and unsympathetic. It also came across as defensive of, and heavily biased towards, the landowner.
Considering more than 2,500 members of the public signed this petition and that this landowner is probably breaking the law, we found your response quite astonishing.
The landowner claims he has been liaising with GCC RoW for several years. He also claims to have shown a RoW officer “an old photograph” of the field. Please can you confirm if this is the case? If so, SORROW would like to know:
1. Were these changes to the Winchcombe Way at Wadfield
Farm made with the prior knowledge of GCC RoW?
2. We would ask why if changes were proposed, the required
statutory notices from GCC RoW weren’t put up giving the
public the opportunity to give their views on the proposed
diversion/surface removal/changes?
3. Our understanding is that a RoW surface is the property of
GCC, in which case how can this be lawfully changed without
your permission?
SORROW takes issue with some of your responses and I will deal with them one by one.
Point 1: The track.
You state: “Historically it was surfaced with building waste, including large prices of concrete. At one point a few years ago, I was told, a woman slipped and broke her ankle on the surface and had to be air lifted to hospital.”
We categorically refute this. The evidence we have shows the contrary. For decades local people and walkers have used this RoW. It was a well-worn and stable, walkable, hard, surface, with some small Cotswold stones. It’s been driven on by cars, it’s been used by runners and elderly walkers. It had grass running up the middle, and a scattering of wild flowers. It was what you might call a typical Cotswold farm track.
You say “you were told that at one point a woman broke her ankle on the track.” Was this reported to GCC RoW, and if so, when?
If not, this is simply hearsay from a third party. If this incident is true, it is one walker from thousands and is still no reason to remove the Cotswold track that formed this RoW surface.
Point 2: Barbed wire:
We are pleased the landowner has set back the wire on the sloping part of the path.
However, there is still a large amount of what we believe is dangerous and unnecessary barbed wire on the Brockhampton Road new entrance – an area, according to your letter, you do not appear to have seen.
Point 3 and 4: We are pleased to learn new signs are going up and that the extra stile will be removed. As of now, the original stile (halfway up) has been only partly removed, the steps remain, whereas the new stile at the bottom of the slope is still in position. If the original stile is to be removed (and the new one left), can we ask that is goes in its entirety? It is currently an obstruction.
Point 5: Er****on of a low gateway.
You say you are “unclear precisely where this is.”
In which case you may be unaware of all the work the landowner has done changing the RoW off Brockhampton Road.
This ‘new low gateway’ is a separate entrance that has been created by him. He has actually diverted the Right of Way here to the side and put in a new low cross bar and entrance gate and fenced path, bordered by several rows of dangerous and unnecessary barbed wire.
This is a major change to a RoW. As far as we are aware by law, this should have been consulted upon and received RoW permission to install.
Point 6: Re-siting of the RoW sign
You are confusing the locations. The entrance to which we refer is off the Brockhampton Road (at the top of the hill above Wadfield Farm), NOT at the OLD Brockhampton Road, which is in a different location at the bottom of Wadfield Farm.
At this location, the RoW sign has been moved from its original position across the road to the other side of the road, to sign the new, low entrance (mentioned above). The landowner has also installed a field gate and cattle grid across the route of the RoW.
As some time has now elapsed, perhaps you have had chance to revisit the site and see the changes we are discussing.