30/05/2026
Zamyšlení nad závodním NW... Za mě moc fajn....
DISCUSSION!
Competitive Nordic Walking:
Facing Similar Challenges to Racewalking and Powerwalking?
One of the most fascinating things happening in walking sports right now is the evolution of competitive Nordic walking.
Originally developed from off-season cross-country ski training and later embraced worldwide as a health and wellness activity, Nordic walking was built around natural movement, full-body engagement, posture, rhythm and active pole propulsion. Proper Nordic walking technique has been shown to help improve fitness, posture, balance, upper-body activation and reduce impact on the joints and spine.
Now it faces a turning point where it needs an agreement by walkers and organizations on what the definition of the competitive sport is and what are rules are that can be accurately and fairly applied. Racewalking has already gone through this.
History of Nordic Walking according to Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_walking
As Nordic walking becomes faster and more competitive, many of the same challenges long seen in racewalking and powerwalking are beginning to appear.
Today, different Nordic walking organizations around the world have developed increasingly detailed rules governing:
-contact with the ground,
-pole propulsion,
-arm mechanics,
-posture,
-hand release,
-body position,
and what separates walking from running.
Rules:
ONWF Nordic Walking
https://nordicwalkingworldleague.com/uploads/downloads/nordicwalkingleaguestatue1-696df036afac7.pdf
INWA Nordic Walking
https://www.inwa-nordicwalking.com/_files/ugd/c6669d_7c609c3bfcfb4004a74533ede1e91c14.pdf
Polish Nordic Walking
https://elektronicznezapisy.pl/download/E5q941P460t0J1C6e9Z3x5c7H9W1J3Y4/open
As in racewalking - definitions and rules cannot be vague or difficult to apply or it creates controversy and weakens the sport.
In many ways, this mirrors the historical evolution of racewalking: as athletes become faster, more specialized and more biomechanically efficient, governing bodies attempt to preserve the identity of the sport through increasingly technical judging systems.
Yet this raises an important question:
Should competitive Nordic walking focus on judging highly detailed movement patterns… or should it focus primarily on preserving the core identity of the sport itself?
Perhaps the future of competitive Nordic walking is a simpler and clearer definition based on:
-visible walking contact,
-active pole propulsion,
-and natural walking rhythm.
If the athlete is clearly walking and genuinely using the poles to generate propulsion, should individual technique variations be allowed to evolve naturally at racing speed?
And if Nordic walking traces its roots back to cross-country ski training, should athletes also be allowed to use more dynamic ski-inspired propulsion techniques — such as stronger arm drive, higher arm swing or occasional double poling — as long as the athlete still clearly fits the definition of Nordic walking and does not transition into running?
At the same time, recreational and fitness Nordic walking can still continue teaching ideal technique for:
-health,
-wellness,
-rehabilitation,
-posture,
-injury prevention,
-and efficient movement.
Maybe the future of Nordic walking is recognizing that: the goals of fitness walking and elite competition are not always exactly the same.
Perhaps fitness Nordic walking should continue emphasizing ideal technique and wellness benefits… while competitive Nordic walking focuses more on preserving the essential identity of the sport while allowing natural athletic evolution.
So what do YOU think?
Can fast walking sports ever be judged completely consistently? Where should the line between walking and running be drawn? And what should define competitive Nordic walking moving forward?
OUR RECOMMENDATIONS: (as in the image)
Definition of Competitive Nordic Walking
Competitive Nordic Walking is a form of human locomotion in which an athlete advances using active pole propulsion while maintaining visible walking contact and a recognizable walking gait.
Proposed Rules of Competitive Nordic Walking
Rule 1 — Walking Contact
At least one foot must appear to remain in contact with the ground at all times to the human eye. Visible flight phase or running is prohibited.
This where technology like the Theracewalkchip could help Nordic walking as well.
Rule 2 — Active Pole Propulsion
Poles must be actively planted and used to generate visible forward propulsion.
Poles may not be merely carried, dragged, or passively placed.
Rule 3 — Recognizable Walking Gait
Movement must maintain a recognizable walking rhythm and gait pattern distinct from running.
Rule 4 — Pole Coordination
Pole action must contribute to locomotion and generally follow natural walking coordination.
Alternating or occasional simultaneous/double-pole actions are permitted provided Rules 1–3 are maintained.
Rule 5 — Technique Freedom
Athletes may use individual biomechanical variations and propulsion techniques provided:
-walking contact is maintained,
-active pole propulsion is evident,
-and movement remains recognizably Nordic walking rather than running.
We hope you found this interesting and generates discussion!
Nordic Walking Essential
Nordic Walkfit
COSTA BLANCA NORDIC WALKING
British Nordic Walking
Ramon Alvarez MNCompetición
ONWF National Club of Ukraine,LET'S GO
