28/01/2023
PARTIDAS MODELOS 1115 EJEMPLOS DE MIS CLASES
Ljubojevic-- Kasparov--A07---niksic 1983
1. e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d3 Nc6 4.g3 d5 5.Nbd2 g6 6.Bg2 Bg7 7.O-O Nge7 8.Re1 b6 9.h4 h6 10.c3 a5 11.a4 Ra7 12.Nb3 d4 13.cxd4 cxd4 14.Bd2 e5 15.Nc1 Be6 16.Re2 O-O 17.Be1 f5 18.Nd2 f4 19.f3 fxg3 20.Bxg3 g5 21.hxg5 Ng6 22.gxh6 Bxh6 23.Nf1 Rg7 24.Rf2 Be3 25.b3 Nf4 0-1
van der wiel---- Kasparov--A45 moscu 1982
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 Ne4 3. Bf4 c5 4. d5 Qb6 5. Bc1 e6 6. f3 Qa5+ 7. c3 Nf6 8. e4 d6 9. Na3 exd5 10. exd5 Be7 11. Nc4 Qd8 12. Ne3 O-O 13. Ne2 Re8 14. g4 Nfd7 15. Ng3 Bg5 16. Kf2 Ne5
17. Bb5 Bd7 18. Bxd7 Nbxd7 19. Nef5 c4 20. Nh5 Nd3+ 21. Kg3 Bxc1 22. Rxc1 g6 0-1
Kasparov--- Gheorghiu--E12 moscu 1982
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.a3 Bb7 5.Nc3 d5 6.cxd5 Nxd5 7.Qc2 c5 8.e4 Nxc3 9.bxc3 Be7 10.Bb5+ Bc6 11.Bd3 Nd7 12.O-O h6 13.Rd1 Qc7 14.d5 exd5 15.exd5 Bxd5 16.Bb5 a6 17.Bf4 Qxf4 18.Bxd7+ Kxd7 19.Rxd5+ Kc7 20.Re1 Bd6 21.Rf5 Qc4 22.Re4 Qb5 23.Rxf7+ Kb8 24.Re6 Rd8 25.c4 Qc6 26.Ne5 Qc8 27.Qb1 1-0
Kasparov-- Nunn..A67—olim lucerna 1982
1. d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.d5 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.e4 g6 7.f4 Bg7 8.Bb5+ Nfd7 {The most common reply. 8. ... Bd7 runs into ugly complications with 9. e5. The move 8. ...Nbd7 invites the extremely double-edged 9. e5 dxe5 10. fxe5 Nh5 11. e6} 9.a4 Na6 10.Nf3 Nb4 11.O-O a6 12.Bxd7+ Bxd7 13.f5 O-O {Still the best defence according to Kasparov who gives analysis to show that 13. ...gxf5 14. Bg5 is very strong for White. -- Borik } 14.Bg5 f6 15.Bf4 gxf5 {A desperate move which only hastens the end. -- Borik} 16.Bxd6 Bxa4 17.Rxa4 Qxd6 18.Nh4 fxe4 19.Nf5 Qd7 20.Nxe4 Kh8 21.Nxc5 { After 21. ...Qxd5 22. Qxd5 Nxd5 23. Ne6 Black is forced to lose the exchange, and at least a pawn to Rd4. A fine victory for Garry.} 1-0
Kasparov-- Najdorf--E12---bugojno 1982
1. d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.a3 { 4.Nc3 Bb4 5.Bg5 Bb7 6.e3 h6 7.Bh4 is also popular, but after capturing at c3, Black gets counterplay. Bxc3+ [ 7...g5 8.Bg3 Ne4 9.Qc2 Bxc3+ 10.bxc3 d6 11.Bd3 f5 12.d5 Nc5 13.h4 g4 14.Nd4 Qf6 15.O-O Nxd3 16.Qxd3 and White was better in a game from the Kasparov vs. Timman match in 1985. ] 8.bxc3 d6 9.Nd2 g5 10.Bg3 Qe7 11.a4 a5 12.h4 Rg8 13.hxg5 hxg5 and Black had a fine game in game 18 of the 1986 Kasparov vs. Karpov World Championship match. } Bb7 { 4...c5 is less effective. A good example is Kasparov's crushing defeats of Van der Wiel and Fedorowicz at the 1981 World Youth Team Championship. 5.d5 Ba6 6.Qc2 Qe7 [ 6...exd5 7.cxd5 g6 8.Nc3 Bg7 9.g3 O-O 10.Bg2 d6 11.O-O Re8 12.Re1 Qc7 13.Bf4 Nh5 14.Bd2 Nd7 15.Qa4 Bb7 16.Qh4 a6 17.Rac1 b5 18.b4 Qd8 19.Bg5 f6 20.Bd2 f5 21.Bg5 Qb6 22.e4 cxb4 23.axb4 Rac8 24.Be3 Qd8 25.Bg5 Qb6 As team captain, I was very worried here, seeing the Black pieces drift away from the kingside. I had no idea how Kasparov would do it, but I expected a breakthrough soon. 26.exf5 Rxe1+ 27.Rxe1 Bxc3 28.Re7 Rc4 29.Qh3 Bc8 30.fxg6 Ndf6 31.Bxf6 Nxf6 32.gxh7+ Kf8
33.h8=Q+ Kxe7 34.Qg7+ and Fedorowicz resigned. The American team did manage to draw the match, thanks to a fine effort by Joel Benjamin. ] 7.Bg5 exd5 8.Nc3 Bxc4 9.e4 h6 10.Bxf6 Qxf6 11.exd5 Bxf1 12.Kxf1 d6 13.Re1+ Be7 14.Ne4 Qg6 15.Qa4+ Kf8 16.h4 and Van der Wiel eventually lost. The kingside pressure was just too much. } 5.Nc3 {This is the Kasparov vs. Petrosian variation, though now it is usually just called the Kasparov Variation, since he not only rehabilitate the line, but also set a good example by racking up many points as White.} d5 {His opponent, the great Miguel Najdorf developer of the Najdorf Variation of the Sicilian was not well prepared for this event. He was supposed to be the arbiter, but when one of the players couldn't make it the veteran gamely stepped in. Still, he plays well in the opening, following the main lines and improving on Petrosian's play. 5...Ne4 led to one of the most famous games in the variation, played by Kasparov against Ulf Andersson at the Tilburg Interpolis tournament of 1981. 6.Nxe4 Bxe4 7.Nd2 Bg6 8.g3 Nc6 9.e3 a6 10.b4 b5 11.cxb5 axb5 12.Bb2 Na7 13.h4 h6 14.d5 exd5 15.Bg2 c6 16.O-O f6 17.Re1 Be7 18.Qg4 Kf7 19.h5 Bh7 20.e4 ! dxe4 21.Bxe4 Bxe4 22.Nxe4 Nc8 23.Rad1 Ra7 24.Nxf6 gxf6 25.Qg6+ Kf8 26.Bc1 d5 27.Rd4 Nd6 28.Rg4 Nf7 29.Bxh6+ Ke8 30.Bg7 Andersson resigned. } 6.cxd5 Nxd5 {Black usually captures with the knight, at after 6...exd5 7.g3 White gets a superior position.} 7.e3 {Kasparov has also been effective with 7.Qc2, especially against Karpov. 7.Qc2 Nd7 8.Nxd5 exd5 9.Bg5 f6 10.Bf4 c5 11.g3 g6 12.h4 with a better position in game 41 of the 1984/85 World Championship. } Be7 8.Bb5+ c6 9.Bd3 Nxc3 { 9...O-O 10.e4 Nxc3 11.bxc3 was better for White in Kasparov vs. Marjanovic, Banja Luka Yugoslavia 1979. } 10.bxc3 c5 11.O-O Nc6 {This is an attempt to improve on the simple castling, where White can get an advantage via rapid development. 11...O-O 12.Qc2 g6 13.e4 Nc6 14.Bh6 and White had the advantage in Kasparov vs. Petrosian, Moscow 1981. Kasparov later blundered away the game in time pressure. } 12.e4 O-O 13.Be3 cxd4 14.cxd4 {White has a good central position, but Black has no weaknesses.} Rc8 15.Qe2 Na5 16.Rfe1 {! Kasparov realizes that the e-pawn will eventually need protection.} Qd6 { 16...Kh8 17.h4 Bxh4 18.Rad1 Be7 19.d5 Bc5 20.Bf4 led to a messy game in Kasparov vs. Groszpeter, also from the 1981 World Youth Team championship. } 17.d5 {! A strong positional pawn sacrifice.} exd5 18.e5 Qe6 19.Nd4 {!} Qxe5 20.Nf5 {White has plenty of compensation for the pawn, with active pieces and attacking changes on the kingside. Black's queenside forces are out of play.} Bf6 21.Qg4 Rce8 {? I recall that as I watched this game from the audience which was large, even in the bucolic little Yugoslav town that this move made little sense to me. I had been concentrating on a different idea. 21...Qc3 was a good move, I thought. Another spectator pointed out to me that this could invite 22.Ne7+ ! Bxe7 23.Bd4 but it wasn't hard to see Qxd4 24.Qxd4 Bf6 25.Qg4 Bxa1 26.Rxa1 and the question is, does White have a change to win. It is hard to evaluate the position. White can try to attack on the h-file or get a rook to the seventh rank. If a pair of rooks are exchanged, then it is likely that the White queen will be able to infiltrate and win a pawn or too. Still, White's advantage would be pretty small, far less than in the game. } 22.Bd2 {Now the queen sacrifice fails for tactical reasons.} Qxa1 23.Rxa1 Bxa1 24.Nxg7 Bxg7 25.Bh6 {Najdorf resigned.} 1-0
