11/05/2026
In almost every acquisition, there is an emotional asymmetry that leaders tend to underestimate.
One organisation experiences the deal as an expansion. The other experiences it as a loss of independence.
Even when the official language speaks of a merger, people inside the two organisations often interpret the situation very differently. For one side, the change signals opportunity and influence, for the other, it raises questions about status, autonomy and long-term security.
,
Research on mergers consistently shows that these different emotional starting points shape how quickly the two organisations begin to cooperate.
From the outside, the integration plan may appear balanced and rational.
Inside the organisation, people are interpreting whether they have gained ground or lost it.
And that interpretation influences behaviour long before the formal structure of the new organisation is fully in place.
***
My newsletter is where I unpack the mechanics behind posts like this in greater detail. Subscription link in profile.
